User contributions for Contribute.Math

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

23:1723:17, 1 May 2020 diff hist −56 Conditional expectation Undid revision 954341788 by Contribute.Math (talk) Tag: Undo
22:5522:55, 1 May 2020 diff hist +56 Conditional expectation The two equalities are false if the distribution of X is not uniform

19:2719:27, 30 April 2020 diff hist +104 Wikipedia talk:No original research No edit summary
19:2619:26, 30 April 2020 diff hist +564 Wikipedia talk:No original research →IMathematics and original research: new section

19:5619:56, 28 April 2020 diff hist +703 Conditional entropy An intuitive explanation of the formal definition is added

18:3018:30, 22 February 2020 diff hist +1,189 Basel problem I added Euler’s second proof. I regret that Deacon Vorbis did not reply to my last message on the talk page. I have been waiting for several months for an answer. Tag: Visual edit

23:4123:41, 19 February 2020 diff hist −86 m User talk:Deacon Vorbis I fixed an error
23:3323:33, 19 February 2020 diff hist +220 User talk:Deacon Vorbis I ask for an answer on a talk page

10:1410:14, 23 December 2019 diff hist +50 m Talk:Basel problem i added a detail
10:0910:09, 23 December 2019 diff hist +434 Talk:Basel problem I completed my comments and corrected a mistake

19:4019:40, 22 December 2019 diff hist −2 m Talk:Basel problem I added a green background
19:3819:38, 22 December 2019 diff hist +4 m Talk:Basel problem Other identation errors
19:3719:37, 22 December 2019 diff hist +4 m Talk:Basel problem Indentation error
19:3519:35, 22 December 2019 diff hist +212 m Talk:Basel problem I added something to my comments
19:3119:31, 22 December 2019 diff hist −250 m Talk:Basel problem I did not manage to sign correctly the first time.
12:3612:36, 22 December 2019 diff hist +35 User:Contribute.Math I added information about me. current
12:2812:28, 22 December 2019 diff hist +637 User talk:Deacon Vorbis I ask you to answer to my messages on the talk page
10:2510:25, 22 December 2019 diff hist +1,927 Talk:Basel problem I answered to Deacon Vorbis, again. I hope that other users will help us find a consensus.

23:5023:50, 21 December 2019 diff hist +1,602 User talk:David Eppstein Need for help to resolve an edit war
17:0617:06, 21 December 2019 diff hist +2,777 Basel problem Deacon Vorbis, I think you did not read the references carefully enough. The proof that I add is exactly the proof published by Euler. I just rewrote it using modern mathematical tools so that readers can understand it more easily and skip certain details that would seem tedious nowadays. I did not write that it is Euler's proof. I just wrote one historical fact : Euler published this proof. Please mention sources on the talk page to prove what you assert. Tag: Visual edit
13:2913:29, 21 December 2019 diff hist +2,738 Basel problem Mabye I was not clear before. We I said "almost the same", I was comparing Euler's second proof and the proof that I added. I was not comparing Euler's first proof and Euler's second proof. Euler's second proof and Euler first proof are not "almost the same". They are completely different. So I am not reproducing a proof which is already in the page. Now I add Euler's second proof, not a proof that is almost the same as Euler's second proof. Tag: Visual edit

22:4022:40, 20 December 2019 diff hist +2,768 Basel problem I added my previous work with one more reference. I mentionned a historical fact proved by the references. I regret that the user Deacon Vorbis deleted my previous work in less than 24 hours. Indeed, he gave me incentives to discuss on the talk page, but he has not replied to the comments I published on that page for two weeks. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

10:3010:30, 7 December 2019 diff hist 0 m Talk:Basel problem I modified the indentation again
10:2810:28, 7 December 2019 diff hist +5 Talk:Basel problem I modified the identation
10:1110:11, 7 December 2019 diff hist +1,128 Talk:Basel problem I replied and added sources

22:1522:15, 6 December 2019 diff hist +33 m Basel problem I justified why one can separate odd and even numbers. Tag: Visual edit
22:1122:11, 6 December 2019 diff hist +58 m Basel problem I explained why one may chose a shorter proof than Euler's one. Tag: Visual edit
21:5521:55, 6 December 2019 diff hist +13 m Basel problem I completed the sources again. Tag: Visual edit
21:4421:44, 6 December 2019 diff hist +22 m Basel problem I added a few words Tag: Visual edit
21:4321:43, 6 December 2019 diff hist +300 m Basel problem I added a reference. Tag: Visual edit
21:3021:30, 6 December 2019 diff hist +324 m Basel problem I completed the sources Tag: Visual edit
19:0519:05, 6 December 2019 diff hist +164 Basel problem I added a reference Tag: Visual edit
18:5718:57, 6 December 2019 diff hist +81 Basel problem I added Euler's book Opera Omnia in the references Tag: Visual edit
18:5018:50, 6 December 2019 diff hist +85 m Talk:Basel problem No edit summary
18:4518:45, 6 December 2019 diff hist +434 Talk:Basel problem Answers
18:3618:36, 6 December 2019 diff hist +1,915 Basel problem I found the book where Euler wrote his second proof. I mentionned that the proof shown here is almost the same. This proof may seem more familiar to some readers because it uses the famous Wallis' integrals. Tag: Visual edit
16:5816:58, 6 December 2019 diff hist +107 m Talk:Basel problem Signature
16:3516:35, 6 December 2019 diff hist +43 Talk:Basel problem No edit summary
16:3316:33, 6 December 2019 diff hist +48 m Talk:Basel problem No edit summary
16:3116:31, 6 December 2019 diff hist +38 m Talk:Basel problem No edit summary
16:2116:21, 6 December 2019 diff hist +71 m Talk:Basel problem I added comments
16:1816:18, 6 December 2019 diff hist −1 m Talk:Basel problem No edit summary
16:1716:17, 6 December 2019 diff hist +352 Talk:Basel problem Answer
16:1116:11, 6 December 2019 diff hist +1,864 Basel problem I mentionned the source of the proof this time. The source is the French page of the same wikipedia article. The latter refer to French sources (L. Euler, « Démonstration de la somme de cette suite 1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + 1/16 + 1/25 + 1/36 + etc. », Journal lit. d'Allemagne, de Suisse et du Nord, vol. 2,‎ 1743, p. 115-127 (lire en ligne [archive]) (E63, Opera Omnia, I.14, p. 177-186), écrit en 1741. Voir aussi sa lettre d'avril 1742 [archive] (OO396) à Clairaut.) Tag: Visual edit
13:3413:34, 6 December 2019 diff hist 0 m Basel problem The sum of odd numbers starts from 0 Tag: Visual edit
12:5212:52, 6 December 2019 diff hist 0 m Basel problem The sum one calculates starts from 1, not 0 Tag: Visual edit
09:0909:09, 6 December 2019 diff hist +3 m Basel problem I remplaced a word and added parenthesis Tag: Visual edit
07:5107:51, 6 December 2019 diff hist +1,445 Basel problem It took into account the two previous remarks from the users who modified the page. I hope that this time I met their requirements. Tag: Visual edit
06:0506:05, 6 December 2019 diff hist +43 N User:Contribute.Math ←Created page with 'I'm a an undergraduate engineering student.' Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
02:1002:10, 6 December 2019 diff hist +3 Basel problem I precised that the proof is rigorous

1 May 2020

30 April 2020

28 April 2020

22 February 2020

19 February 2020

23 December 2019

22 December 2019

21 December 2019

20 December 2019

7 December 2019

6 December 2019