User contributions for Chicagoexchanger
A user with 12 edits. Account created on 2 April 2012.
9 April 2012
- 02:1002:10, 9 April 2012 diff hist −200 Ayn Rand The cited source does not back up the statement. Truth and fact should be published here not unsupported bias and speculation. Talk supports my edit.
5 April 2012
- 21:1121:11, 5 April 2012 diff hist +240 User talk:Polisher of Cobwebs →Ayn Rand: new section
- 20:5720:57, 5 April 2012 diff hist −200 Ayn Rand Undid revision 485777643 by Polisher of Cobwebs (talk)
- 20:3920:39, 5 April 2012 diff hist −200 Ayn Rand Gladstien's book does not support this issue please read the referenced pages; why is this still an issue this is clearly unethical sourcing and the comments on the talk page agree with me.
- 15:3715:37, 5 April 2012 diff hist −200 Ayn Rand Clearly the talk discussion supports the deletion of this line and the source cited does not at all back up the claim; why is this such an issue? This should not be on the page.
2 April 2012
- 21:2821:28, 2 April 2012 diff hist −192 Ayn Rand Mini Gladstein used no data at all when she wrote this statement in her book it is pure opinion and frame dependent. Uof Chicago clearly favors Rand. Deleting the sentence is optimal and a good compromise.
- 21:1621:16, 2 April 2012 diff hist −192 Ayn Rand Please read the source carefully; it is the writers opinion and is not backed by data; real data suggest his opinion is wrong, the "source" is poor at best; a good compromise is to delete the opinion sentence and stick to facts.
- 20:5620:56, 2 April 2012 diff hist −192 Ayn Rand This statement is speculation at best . Theres is no way they had a majority count from acadamia or for critics. There are ample data to suggest she was well received; erasing the opinion sentence is well justified and likely optimal from Nash point
- 20:2220:22, 2 April 2012 diff hist −199 Ayn Rand No edit summary
- 16:5516:55, 2 April 2012 diff hist −120 m Ayn Rand I can prove the positive nature of the Literary review; the only negative review was from a communist (which would make sense). The reference for this former point is poor at best. Further, all of her books were on the best seller list.
- 14:0414:04, 2 April 2012 diff hist −63 m Ayn Rand I changed the last paragraph of the intro to reflect fact and less opinion. Her works were well recieved by literary critics (ample evidence). Also, the ref. (harvnb/sciabarra) does not support what was written.
- 12:5212:52, 2 April 2012 diff hist −69 Ayn Rand No edit summary
