User contributions for Bloggerhead
Results for Bloggerhead talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 20 edits. Account created on 21 January 2007.
7 August 2007
- 15:0115:01, 7 August 2007 diff hist +98 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Stop your threats, kww. That was your second revert. Another one and you will be reported for 3RRR violation.
- 14:3414:34, 7 August 2007 diff hist +98 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Kww: Stop being a nutcase. That sentence is not new. It existed in the article until 4 August 2007. Besides, it is not a POV, it is a well-known fact.
- 14:0914:09, 7 August 2007 diff hist −5 Spam Prevention Early Warning System No edit summary
- 13:4613:46, 7 August 2007 diff hist +119 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Foobar: And yet, you happily allowed the Shaw references to stand until 4 August 2007. Did you write those references?
5 August 2007
- 20:3120:31, 5 August 2007 diff hist −258 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Either provide specific counter-evidence to revisions or stop spreading inaccurate and misleading information. Text returned to its original state as it stood on 4 August plus documented revisions
- 20:0020:00, 5 August 2007 diff hist −258 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Kww: Factual information should not be compromised. If you have any evidence or reasoning to counteract the revisions, provide them in your edit summaries
- 19:0519:05, 5 August 2007 diff hist +198 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Kww: You keep undoing the revisions without providing a single evidence to counteract them. Can one conclude that you are here to feed inaccurate or misleading information to readers?
- 17:1917:19, 5 August 2007 diff hist −423 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Kww: You still have not provided specific evidence to counteract the revisions made (6 in all).
- 16:3516:35, 5 August 2007 diff hist −423 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Kww: You have not provided any supporting evidence to contradict the revisions.
- 15:5715:57, 5 August 2007 diff hist +42 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Undo accepted. However, SPEWS was not unique in providing information about senders of spam
- 15:4315:43, 5 August 2007 diff hist +6 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Changed to past tense
- 15:3915:39, 5 August 2007 diff hist −217 Spam Prevention Early Warning System The osirusoft zone acted as a mirror for SPEWS data. It was not a DNSBL per se.
- 15:2015:20, 5 August 2007 diff hist +1 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Changed to past tense
- 15:1715:17, 5 August 2007 diff hist −98 Spam Prevention Early Warning System The SORBS zones acted as a mirror for SPEWS data, they were not DNSBLs per se. See filter.html at spews.org.
- 15:0515:05, 5 August 2007 diff hist −157 Spam Prevention Early Warning System As Kww indicated, this is merely a claim. It is not backed by evidence. It could well be that the SPEWS admins were of (fill in) origin and did not want to be identified as such
- 01:5401:54, 5 August 2007 diff hist −157 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Nothing found at spews.org to support the hypothesis that the SPEWS admins remained anonymous to avoid lawsuits or harassment.
- 01:4801:48, 5 August 2007 diff hist −96 Spam Prevention Early Warning System Which DNSBLs use the SPEWS data?
- 01:3201:32, 5 August 2007 diff hist −155 Spam Prevention Early Warning System A siginificant number of SPEWS listed IP addresses were being used by non spamming email users. Labeling those users as senders of spam is misleading.
7 April 2007
- 21:0021:00, 7 April 2007 diff hist +52 Spam Prevention Early Warning System No edit summary
