User contributions for Advancedtelcotv

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

14:5714:57, 22 October 2009 diff hist −590 G.hn Yes. Four vendors is a fact.
14:4314:43, 22 October 2009 diff hist −587 G.hn No edit summary
13:5613:56, 22 October 2009 diff hist −509 G.hn No edit summary
12:4312:43, 22 October 2009 diff hist −545 G.hn The summary of G.cx draft says "the coex mechanism allows ITU-T G.996x devices to coexist with other devices implementing this Rec."
11:1211:12, 22 October 2009 diff hist −553 G.hn 2009 not finished. Indeed G.cx allows G.hn devices that use G.cx to coexist with others. Not true that several analysts say that.
10:3110:31, 22 October 2009 diff hist −21 G.hn BBHC did not criticize. They quoted a criticism.
10:3010:30, 22 October 2009 diff hist +49 G.hn Anybody that has sent a contribution is an active contributor
10:2810:28, 22 October 2009 diff hist −320 G.hn Nobody has announced that chips will not be available in 2009.
09:0109:01, 22 October 2009 diff hist −113 G.hn →Service providers
08:5908:59, 22 October 2009 diff hist −320 G.hn →Status

16:2116:21, 21 October 2009 diff hist −320 G.hn Again, we don't know that products are not available in 2009 until 2009 finishes.
16:1816:18, 21 October 2009 diff hist +28 G.hn MoCA 2 has not been announced by MoCA. HPAV2 has not been announced by HP.
14:4714:47, 21 October 2009 diff hist −5 G.hn →Related standards
14:4614:46, 21 October 2009 diff hist −80 G.hn →Service providers: None of them have expressed opposition either.
14:4514:45, 21 October 2009 diff hist −4 G.hn →Status
14:4414:44, 21 October 2009 diff hist −298 G.hn →Status: 2009 not finished yet.
14:4114:41, 21 October 2009 diff hist −8 G.hn Rewrote for improved reading.
14:3614:36, 21 October 2009 diff hist +28 G.hn Those technologies have not been formally announced.

18:1518:15, 20 October 2009 diff hist −290 G.hn →Industry Analysts: Did you even read the "criticism" section? The same quote is there already.
17:3817:38, 20 October 2009 diff hist −290 G.hn That quote is already in the "criticism" section
17:3417:34, 20 October 2009 diff hist −429 G.hn Not true that schedule is unknown. Year 2009 has not finished. No public info on MoCA 2 o HPAV2 available.
15:5815:58, 20 October 2009 diff hist −125 IEEE 1901 Undid revision 321016322 by EthernetOverPower (talk) Removed subjective opinion
14:0614:06, 20 October 2009 diff hist +110 G.hn Restored text that had been removed without reason.
14:0314:03, 20 October 2009 diff hist −290 G.hn →Industry Analysts: Removed duplicated quote (which is already in the "criticism" section)
14:0314:03, 20 October 2009 diff hist −337 G.hn No edit summary

15:3215:32, 13 October 2009 diff hist +137 Low-density parity-check code Adding reference that discusses LDPC vs CTC in G.hn

21:1721:17, 8 June 2009 diff hist +367 G.hn →Silicon and IP Vendors: Added reference to Intel white paper on G.hn

21:5821:58, 29 May 2009 diff hist −263 G.hn Yes, the reference is correct, that's why it's still there. Why don't you fix your grammar instead of bringing the same incorrect text again?
16:4616:46, 29 May 2009 diff hist −263 G.hn Removed redundant text with poor grammar.

20:4620:46, 26 May 2009 diff hist −63 Fiber to the x →Fiber to the "premises" or "pole": There is no source for this statement about 1Gbit over AC lines (although there are some for "1Gbit over coax" at G.hn)
20:4220:42, 26 May 2009 diff hist −102 Fiber to the x →Differentiating where fiber meets metal in a broadband infrastructure: The term "last mile telecommunications" is generic enough, no need to provide a list of all possible services.

01:0701:07, 25 May 2009 diff hist +377 TR-069 Added reference to blog post on using TR-069 for in-home networks

08:0608:06, 17 May 2009 diff hist +377 User talk:142.177.8.48 No edit summary
08:0308:03, 17 May 2009 diff hist −29 Internet Protocol television Added {{cn}}. Clarified standards names. G.hn is the one for IPTV. Also, I think most of the energy-related text does not fit here, but didn't have time to edit it. I hope somebody else does...

21:1421:14, 14 May 2009 diff hist +710 Talk:G.hn →Story by Louis E. Frenzel on electronicdesign.com
20:2920:29, 14 May 2009 diff hist −546 G.hn No, he is saying "I have been unable to find out why this whole effort got started [...]". He is admitting he doesn't know about it.
20:1520:15, 14 May 2009 diff hist −546 G.hn No, it's not. It simply says that the author admits that he has not researched G.hn. The information is not about G.hn, it's about the author.
20:0720:07, 14 May 2009 diff hist −546 G.hn No, only content relevant to G.hn should be included here.
19:3019:30, 14 May 2009 diff hist −546 G.hn The quoted author is simply talking about his ignorance on the G.hn standard. I don't see how this is relevant to this wikipedia page.
19:0819:08, 14 May 2009 diff hist −546 G.hn Undid revision 289935502 by 90.41.24.69 (talk)
06:4206:42, 14 May 2009 diff hist −546 G.hn thanks for fixing the reference! :-)