User contributions for Abstract objects

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

13:2513:25, 3 November 2018 diff hist +2 m Reconstruction era Clarify wording concerning enforcement of Reconstruction amendments

22:4222:42, 9 September 2018 diff hist −45 Korematsu v. United States Reverse addition of Overruled to template — see Talk

02:0802:08, 24 July 2018 diff hist +2 m Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections Changed awkward "February 13, 2018, testimony" construction to "testimony on February 13, 2018"

05:2205:22, 16 July 2018 diff hist +1 m Word and Object Change placement of confusing clause for ease of reading
05:0905:09, 16 July 2018 diff hist 0 m Alexius Meinong Altered sentence style for easier reading 2
05:0605:06, 16 July 2018 diff hist +3 m Alexius Meinong Altered sentence style for easier reading
04:5804:58, 16 July 2018 diff hist −18 m Sense and reference Took out "what *we* now call"

03:2803:28, 28 June 2018 diff hist −10 m Korematsu v. United States Applying solution to past tense wording of Supreme Court ruling; (Correction in summary: *does not contradict sources)
03:1903:19, 28 June 2018 diff hist −766 Korematsu v. United States Again, solution to dicta problem is to not explicitly state overrule, or practical effects; this does contradict sources Tag: references removed

03:1603:16, 27 June 2018 diff hist −143 Korematsu v. United States Solution to dicta problem mentioned in Talk is to just not mention any strict legal overrule, or practical effects of the "repudiation"