User contributions for 5.80.37.0
Appearance
Results for 5.80.37.0 talk block log logs global block log filter log
21 January 2016
- 19:0119:01, 21 January 2016 diff hist +279 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R v. Elliott →R v. Elliott: added opinions in favour of keeping
- 14:1914:19, 21 January 2016 diff hist +340 R v Elliott Undid revision 700934382: Interpretation of the statement may well be opinion but it is not in doubt that they admitted it. They have stated this in court and it is recorded in items 36 in publicly available docs you have not allowable as references.
- 14:0514:05, 21 January 2016 diff hist +904 R v Elliott Undid revision 700932159 by Strongjam (talk) Blatchford article clearly states Guthrie et al admit the lack of threatening messages. It is also in publicly available court documents.
- 13:4113:41, 21 January 2016 diff hist +340 R v Elliott Added again the police and guthrie's admission that Elliott did not threaten or send sexual messages. No court documents referred to this time, but one of the original articles clearly states that the police and Guthrie acknowledge this
- 09:0909:09, 21 January 2016 diff hist +478 R v Elliott Added reference from the case to support Guthrie et al. stating he had not threatened or used sexually harassing language