User contributions for 2603:8081:2000:462:481E:E998:8560:E683

10 April 2025

• 03:1003:10, 10 April 2025 diff hist −469 Bahira Removed biased and opinionated language that had no source attached to it.
• 02:3202:32, 10 April 2025 diff hist 0 Bahira No edit summary
• 02:2902:29, 10 April 2025 diff hist +2,570 Bahira The article reads biased as it repeatedly cites one medieval scholar who doubted the truthfulness of the story and makes no mention of the majority of scholars of Islam that accept it as true. The article does not mention them (prior to my edit) nor does it give accounts of these scholars, many of whom have credentials and recognition beyond that of the scholar quoted. I aimed at providing a more neutral and scholarly discussion of this supposed historical figure.
• 02:0802:08, 10 April 2025 diff hist +1,116 Bahira No edit summary
• 02:0202:02, 10 April 2025 diff hist +58 Bahira Biased statement removed that attests that all modern historians reject this person and deem it as fictious and a statement asserting the nuance of disagreement by contemporary historians replaces that.