In mathematics, Pascal's rule (or Pascal's formula) is a combinatorialidentity about binomial coefficients. The binomial coefficients are the numbers that appear in Pascal's triangle. Pascal's rule states that for positive integersn and k,
where is the binomial coefficient, namely the coefficient of the xk term in the expansion of (1 + x)n. There is no restriction on the relative sizes of n and k;[1] in particular, the above identity remains valid when n < k since whenever n < k.
Together with the boundary conditions for all nonnegative integers n, Pascal's rule determines that
for all integers 0 ≤ k ≤ n. In this sense, Pascal's rule is the recurrence relation that defines the binomial coefficients.
Pascal's rule has an intuitive combinatorial meaning, that is clearly expressed in this counting proof.[2]: 44
Proof. Recall that equals the number of subsets with k elements from a set with n elements. Suppose one particular element is uniquely labeled X in a set with n elements.
To construct a subset of k elements containing X, include X and choose k − 1 elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are such subsets.
To construct a subset of k elements not containing X, choose k elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are such subsets.
Every subset of k elements either contains X or not. The total number of subsets with k elements in a set of n elements is the sum of the number of subsets containing X and the number of subsets that do not contain X, .
Alternatively, the algebraic derivation of the binomial case follows.
An alternative algebraic proof using the alternative definition of binomial coefficients: . Indeed
Since is used as the extended definition of the binomial coefficient when z is a complex number, thus the above alternative algebraic proof shows that Pascal's rule holds more generally when n is replaced by any complex number.
Pascal's rule can be generalized to multinomial coefficients.[2]: 144 For any integerp such that , and ,
where is the coefficient of the term in the expansion of .
The algebraic derivation for this general case is as follows.[2]: 144 Let p be an integer such that , and . Then