Minotaur-class ironclad
 |
 Minotaur, 1875–1887
| |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Name | Minotaur class |
| Operators |  Royal Navy |
| Preceded by | HMS Achilles |
| Succeeded by | Prince Consort class |
| Completed | 3 |
| Scrapped | 3 |
| General characteristics | |
| Class & type | Armoured frigate |
| Displacement | 10,627 long tons (10,798 t) |
| Length | 407 ft 0 in (124.05 m) (o/a) |
| Beam | 59 ft 6 in (18.1 m) |
| Draught | 27 ft 9 in (8.5 m) |
| Installed power |
|
| Propulsion | 1 shaft, 1 trunk steam engine |
| Sail plan | 5-masted |
| Speed | 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph) |
| Range | 1,500 nmi (2,800 km; 1,700 mi) at 7.5 knots (13.9 km/h; 8.6 mph) |
| Complement | 800 actual |
| Armament |
|
| Armour | |
The Minotaur-class ironclads consisted of three armoured frigates built for the Royal Navy during the 1860s. They were enlarged versions of HMS Achilles with heavier armament, thicker armour, and more powerful engines. The ships of this class were unique among ironclad warships in possessing on completion five masts, named fore-, second-, main-, fourth- and mizzen-.
History
[edit]They were originally intended to mount forty Armstrong 110-pounder breech-loading guns on the main deck, with ten more on pivot mountings on the upper deck. The failure of these guns in service led to a complete re-evaluation of their armament, with a concomitant delay in the arming of the whole class. The ships were armed with a combination of 9-inch muzzle-loading rifles (MLR) on metal carriages and 7-inch MLRs on rope-worked carriages. In a moderate swell these 7-inch guns were virtually unworkable, making the Minotaurs both the heaviest and the worst armed of the Victorian battleships.
The Minotaurs were poor sailors, never exceeding a speed under sail of about 9.5 knots (17.6 km/h; 10.9 mph) with all sail set and a favourable wind. They were, in spite of the number of masts they exhibited, the most sluggish of all British ironclads under sail. They were regarded as good sea-boats, and were considered to be among the steadiest ships in the battle-fleet[citation needed]. They were slow in manoeuvre under hand-steering, but were regarded as good after steam steering was fitted.
Notes
[edit]
References
[edit]- Ballard, G. A. (1980). The Black Battlefleet. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-924-3.
- Brown, David K. (2003) [1997]. Warrior to Dreadnought: Warship Development 1860–1905. Caxton Editions. ISBN 1-84067-529-2.
- Friedman, Norman (2018). British Battleships of the Victorian Era. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-68247-329-0.
- Parkes, Oscar (1990) [1966]. British Battleships, Warrior 1860 to Vanguard 1950: A History of Design, Construction, and Armament (New & rev. ed.). Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-075-4.
- Roberts, John (1979). "Great Britain (including Empire Forces)". In Chesneau, Roger & Kolesnik, Eugene M. (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. Mayflower Books. pp. 1–113. ISBN 0-8317-0302-4.
- Silverstone, Paul H. (1984). Directory of the World's Capital Ships. Hippocrene Books. ISBN 0-88254-979-0.
- Text Book of Gunnery. London: Harrison and Sons for His Majesty's Stationery Office. 1887. Archived from the original on 4 December 2012. Retrieved 27 September 2010.
- Winfield, Rif (2014). British Warships in the Age of Sail 1817–1863: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates. Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84832-169-4.