Jump to content

Error function

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, the error function (also called the Gauss error function), often denoted by , is the function[1]

Error function
Plot of the error function over real numbers
Plot of the error function over real numbers
General information
General definition
Fields of applicationProbability, thermodynamics, digital communications
Domain, codomain and image
Domain
Image
Basic features
ParityOdd
Specific features
Root0
Derivative
Antiderivative
Series definition
Taylor series

The integral here is a complex contour integral which is path-independent because is holomorphic on the whole complex plane . In many applications, the function argument is a real number, in which case the function value is also real.

In some older texts,[2] the error function is defined without the factor of . This nonelementary integral is a sigmoid function that occurs often in probability, statistics, and partial differential equations.

In statistics, for non-negative real values of , the error function has the following interpretation: for a real random variable that is normally distributed with mean 0 and standard deviation , is the probability that falls in the range .

Two closely related functions are the complementary error function

and the imaginary error function

where is the imaginary unit.

Name

[edit]

The name "error function" and its abbreviation were proposed by J. W. L. Glaisher in 1871 on account of its connection with "the theory of probability, and notably the theory of errors".[3] The complementary error function was also discussed by Glaisher in a separate publication in the same year.[4] For the "law of facility" of errors whose density is given by

(the normal distribution), Glaisher calculates the probability of an error lying between and as

Applications

[edit]

When the results of a series of measurements are described by a normal distribution with standard deviation and expected value zero, then

is the probability that the error of a single measurement lies between and . This is useful, for example, in determining the bit error rate of a digital communication system.

The error and complementary error functions occur, for example, in solutions of the heat equation when boundary conditions are given by the Heaviside step function.

The error function and its approximations can be used to estimate results that hold with high probability or with low probability. Given a normally distributed random variable with mean and standard deviation and a constant , it can be shown (via integration by substitution) that

where and are certain numeric constants. If is sufficiently far from the mean, specifically, , then

and so the probability goes to 0 as .

The probability for being in the interval can be derived as

Properties

[edit]
Plots in the complex plane
exp(−z2) in the complex plane, with domain coloring.
erf(z) in the complex plane.

The error function is an odd function. This directly results from the fact that the integrand is an even function (since the antiderivative of an even function which is zero at the origin is an odd function, and vice versa).

Since the error function is an entire function which maps real numbers to real numbers, for any complex number ,

where denotes the complex conjugate of .

The error function at is exactly (see Gaussian integral). At the real axis, approaches at and at . At the imaginary axis, it tends to .

Taylor series

[edit]

The error function is an entire function; it has no singularities (except at infinity) and its Taylor expansion always converges. For , however, cancellation of leading terms makes the Taylor expansion impractical.

The defining integral cannot be evaluated in closed form in terms of elementary functions (see Liouville's theorem), but by expanding the integrand into its Maclaurin series, integrating term by term,[5] and using the fact that , one obtains the error function's Maclaurin series as: which holds for every complex number . The denominator terms form sequence A007680 in the OEIS. This is a special case of Kummer's function:

For iterative calculation of the above series, the following alternative formulation may be useful: because

expresses the multiplier to turn the -th term into the -th term (considering as the first term).

The imaginary error function has a similar Maclaurin series: which holds for every complex number .

Derivative and integral

[edit]

The derivative of the error function follows immediately from its definition: From this, the derivative of the imaginary error function is also immediate: Higher order derivatives are given by where the are the physicists' Hermite polynomials.[6]

An antiderivative of the error function, obtainable by integration by parts, is An antiderivative of the imaginary error function, also obtainable by integration by parts, is

Bürmann series

[edit]

An expansion which converges more rapidly for all real values of than a Taylor expansion[7] is obtained by using Bürmann's theorem:[8] where is the sign function. By keeping only the first two coefficients and choosing and , the resulting approximation shows its largest relative error at , where it is less than :

Inverse functions

[edit]
Inverse error function

Given a complex number , there is not a unique complex number satisfying , so a true inverse function would be multivalued. However, for , there is a unique real number denoted satisfying

The inverse error function is usually defined with domain , and it is restricted to this domain in many computer algebra systems. However, it can be extended to the disk of the complex plane, using the Maclaurin series[9] where and

So we have the series expansion (common factors have been canceled from numerators and denominators):

(After cancellation the numerator and denominator values in (sequence A092676 in the OEIS) and (sequence A092677 in the OEIS) respectively; without cancellation the numerator terms are values in (sequence A002067 in the OEIS).) The error function's value at is equal to .

For , we have .

The inverse complementary error function is defined as For real , there is a unique real number satisfying . The inverse imaginary error function is defined as .[10]

For any real , Newton's method can be used to compute , and for , the following Maclaurin series converges:

where is defined as above.

Asymptotic expansion

[edit]

A useful asymptotic expansion of the complementary error function (and therefore also of the error function) for large real is where is the double factorial of , i.e. the product of all odd numbers up to . This series diverges for every finite , and its meaning as asymptotic expansion is that for any integer one has

where the remainder is

which follows easily by induction, writing

and integrating by parts. The asymptotic behavior of the remainder term is

as . This can be found by

For large enough values of , only the first few terms of this asymptotic expansion are needed to obtain a good approximation of (while for not too large values of , the above Taylor expansion at 0 provides a very fast convergence).

Continued fraction expansion

[edit]

A continued fraction expansion of the complementary error function was found by Laplace:[11][12] where .

Factorial series

[edit]

The inverse factorial series

converges for . Here

where denotes the rising factorial, and denotes a signed Stirling number of the first kind.[13][14] The Taylor series can be written in terms of the double factorial:

Bounds and numerical approximations

[edit]

Approximation with elementary functions

[edit]

Abramowitz and Stegun give several approximations of varying accuracy (equations 7.1.25–28). This allows one to choose the fastest approximation suitable for a given application. In order of increasing accuracy, they are: (maximum error: 5×10−4)

where a1 = 0.278393, a2 = 0.230389, a3 = 0.000972, a4 = 0.078108

(maximum error: 2.5×10−5)

where p = 0.47047, a1 = 0.3480242, a2 = −0.0958798, a3 = 0.7478556

(maximum error: 3×10−7)

where a1 = 0.0705230784, a2 = 0.0422820123, a3 = 0.0092705272, a4 = 0.0001520143, a5 = 0.0002765672, a6 = 0.0000430638

(maximum error: 1.5×10−7)

where p = 0.3275911, a1 = 0.254829592, a2 = −0.284496736, a3 = 1.421413741, a4 = −1.453152027, a5 = 1.061405429

One can improve the accuracy of the A&S approximation by extending it with three extra parameters, where p1 = 0.406742016006509, p2 = 0.0072279182302319, a1 = 0.316879890481381, a2 = -0.138329314150635, a3 = 1.08680830347054, a4 = -1.11694155120396, a5 = 1.20644903073232, a6 = -0.393127715207728, a7 = 0.0382613542530727. The maximum error of this approximation is about 2×10−9. The parameters are obtained by fitting the extended approximation to the accurate values of the error function using the following Python code.


All of these approximations are valid for x ≥ 0. To use these approximations for negative x, use the fact that erf(x) is an odd function, so erf(x) = −erf(−x).


Exponential bounds and a pure exponential approximation for the complementary error function are given by[15]

The above have been generalized to sums of N exponentials[16] with increasing accuracy in terms of N so that erfc(x) can be accurately approximated or bounded by 2(2x), where In particular, there is a systematic methodology to solve the numerical coefficients {(an,bn)}N
n = 1
that yield a minimax approximation or bound for the closely related Q-function: Q(x) ≈ (x), Q(x) ≤ (x), or Q(x) ≥ (x) for x ≥ 0. The coefficients {(an,bn)}N
n = 1
for many variations of the exponential approximations and bounds up to N = 25 have been released to open access as a comprehensive dataset.[17]


A tight approximation of the complementary error function for x ∈ [0,∞) is given by Karagiannidis & Lioumpas (2007),[18] who showed for the appropriate choice of parameters {A,B} that They determined {A,B} = {1.98,1.135}, which gave a good approximation[which?] for all x ≥ 0. Alternative coefficients are also available for tailoring accuracy for a specific application or transforming the expression into a tight bound.[19]

A single-term lower bound is[20] where the parameter β can be picked to minimize error on the desired interval of approximation.

Another approximation is given by Sergei Winitzki using his "global Padé approximations":[21][22]: 2–3  where This is designed to be very accurate in the neighborhoods of 0 and infinity, and the relative error is less than 0.00035 for all real x. Using the alternate value a ≈ 0.147 reduces the maximum relative error to about 0.00013.[23]

The extended "global Pade" approximation, provides a maximum error of about 2×10−9, as demonstrated by the following Python script.

Winitzki's approximation can be inverted to obtain an approximation for the inverse error function:

An approximation with a maximal error of 1.2×10−7 for any real argument is:[24]

An approximation of with a maximum relative error less than in absolute value is:[25] for , and for

A simple approximation for real-valued arguments can be done through hyperbolic functions: which keeps the absolute difference .

Since the error function and the Gaussian Q-function are closely related through the identity or equivalently , bounds developed for the Q-function can be adapted to approximate the complementary error function. A pair of tight lower and upper bounds on the Gaussian Q-function for positive arguments was introduced by Abreu (2012)[26] based on a simple algebraic expression with only two exponential terms:

These bounds stem from a unified form where the parameters and are selected to ensure the bounding properties: for the lower bound, and , and for the upper bound, and . These expressions maintain simplicity and tightness, providing a practical trade-off between accuracy and ease of computation. They are particularly valuable in theoretical contexts, such as communication theory over fading channels, where both functions frequently appear. Additionally, the original Q-function bounds can be extended to for positive integers via the binomial theorem, suggesting potential adaptability for powers of , though this is less commonly required in error function applications.

Table of values

[edit]
x erf(x) 1 − erf(x)
0 0 1
0.02 0.022564575 0.977435425
0.04 0.045111106 0.954888894
0.06 0.067621594 0.932378406
0.08 0.090078126 0.909921874
0.1 0.112462916 0.887537084
0.2 0.222702589 0.777297411
0.3 0.328626759 0.671373241
0.4 0.428392355 0.571607645
0.5 0.520499878 0.479500122
0.6 0.603856091 0.396143909
0.7 0.677801194 0.322198806
0.8 0.742100965 0.257899035
0.9 0.796908212 0.203091788
1 0.842700793 0.157299207
1.1 0.880205070 0.119794930
1.2 0.910313978 0.089686022
1.3 0.934007945 0.065992055
1.4 0.952285120 0.047714880
1.5 0.966105146 0.033894854
1.6 0.976348383 0.023651617
1.7 0.983790459 0.016209541
1.8 0.989090502 0.010909498
1.9 0.992790429 0.007209571
2 0.995322265 0.004677735
2.1 0.997020533 0.002979467
2.2 0.998137154 0.001862846
2.3 0.998856823 0.001143177
2.4 0.999311486 0.000688514
2.5 0.999593048 0.000406952
3 0.999977910 0.000022090
3.5 0.999999257 0.000000743
[edit]

Complementary error function

[edit]
Plot of the error function erf(z) in the complex plane from −2 − 2i to 2 + 2i

The complementary error function, denoted erfc, is defined as which also defines erfcx, the scaled complementary error function[27] (which can be used instead of erfc to avoid arithmetic underflow[27][28]). Another form of erfc x for x ≥ 0 is known as Craig's formula, after its discoverer:[29] This expression is valid only for positive values of x, but can be used in conjunction with erfc(x) = 2 − erfc(−x) to obtain erfc(x) for negative values. This form is advantageous in that the range of integration is fixed and finite. An extension of this expression for the erfc of the sum of two non-negative variables is[30]

Imaginary error function

[edit]
Plot of the imaginary error function erfi(z) in the complex plane from −2 − 2i to 2 + 2i

The imaginary error function, denoted erfi, is defined as where D(x) is the Dawson function (which can be used instead of erfi to avoid arithmetic overflow[27]).

Despite the name "imaginary error function", erfi(x) is real when x is real.

When the error function is evaluated for arbitrary complex arguments z, the resulting complex error function is usually discussed in scaled form as the Faddeeva function:

Cumulative distribution function

[edit]
The normal cumulative distribution function plotted in the complex plane

The error function is essentially identical to the standard normal cumulative distribution function, denoted Φ, also named norm(x) by some software languages[citation needed], as they differ only by scaling and translation. Indeed, or rearranged for erf and erfc:

Consequently, the error function is also closely related to the Q-function, which is the tail probability of the standard normal distribution. The Q-function can be expressed in terms of the error function as

The inverse of Φ is known as the normal quantile function, or probit function and may be expressed in terms of the inverse error function as

The standard normal cdf is used more often in probability and statistics, and the error function is used more often in other branches of mathematics.

The error function is a special case of the Mittag-Leffler function, and can also be expressed as a confluent hypergeometric function (Kummer's function):

It has a simple expression in terms of the Fresnel integral.[further explanation needed]

In terms of the regularized gamma function P and the incomplete gamma function, sgn(x) is the sign function.

Iterated integrals of the complementary error function

[edit]

The iterated integrals of the complementary error function are defined by[31]

The general recurrence formula is

They have the power series from which follow the symmetry properties and

Implementations

[edit]

As real function of a real argument

[edit]

As complex function of a complex argument

[edit]
  • libcerf, numeric C library for complex error functions, provides the complex functions cerf, cerfc, cerfcx and the real functions erfi, erfcx with approximately 13–14 digits precision, based on the Faddeeva function as implemented in the MIT Faddeeva Package

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Andrews (1998), p. 110.
  2. ^ Whittaker & Watson (2021), p. 358.
  3. ^ Glaisher (1871a).
  4. ^ Glaisher (1871b).
  5. ^ Fischer & Lieb (2011).
  6. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Erf". MathWorld.
  7. ^ Schöpf & Supancic (2014).
  8. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Bürmann's Theorem". MathWorld.
  9. ^ Dominici, Diego (2006). "Asymptotic analysis of the derivatives of the inverse error function". arXiv:math/0607230.
  10. ^ Bergsma, Wicher (2006). "On a new correlation coefficient, its orthogonal decomposition and associated tests of independence". arXiv:math/0604627.
  11. ^ Laplace (1805), p. 255, livre X.
  12. ^ Cuyt et al. (2008).
  13. ^ Schlömilch, Oskar Xavier (1859). "Ueber facultätenreihen". Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik (in German). 4: 390–415.
  14. ^ Nielson (1906), p. 283, eq. 3.
  15. ^ Chiani, M.; Dardari, D.; Simon, M.K. (2003). "New Exponential Bounds and Approximations for the Computation of Error Probability in Fading Channels" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. 2 (4): 840–845. Bibcode:2003ITWC....2..840C. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.190.6761. doi:10.1109/TWC.2003.814350. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 20 October 2014.
  16. ^ Tanash, I.M.; Riihonen, T. (2020). "Global minimax approximations and bounds for the Gaussian Q-function by sums of exponentials". IEEE Transactions on Communications. 68 (10): 6514–6524. arXiv:2007.06939. Bibcode:2020ITCom..68.6514T. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2020.3006902. S2CID 220514754.
  17. ^ Tanash, I.M.; Riihonen, T. (2020). "Coefficients for Global Minimax Approximations and Bounds for the Gaussian Q-Function by Sums of Exponentials [Data set]". Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4112978.
  18. ^ Karagiannidis, G. K.; Lioumpas, A. S. (2007). "An improved approximation for the Gaussian Q-function" (PDF). IEEE Communications Letters. 11 (8): 644–646. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2007.070470. S2CID 4043576.
  19. ^ Tanash, I.M.; Riihonen, T. (2021). "Improved coefficients for the Karagiannidis–Lioumpas approximations and bounds to the Gaussian Q-function". IEEE Communications Letters. 25 (5): 1468–1471. arXiv:2101.07631. Bibcode:2021IComL..25.1468T. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2021.3052257. S2CID 231639206.
  20. ^ Chang, Seok-Ho; Cosman, Pamela C.; Milstein, Laurence B. (November 2011). "Chernoff-Type Bounds for the Gaussian Error Function". IEEE Transactions on Communications. 59 (11): 2939–2944. Bibcode:2011ITCom..59.2939C. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2011.072011.100049. S2CID 13636638.
  21. ^ Winitzki, Sergei (2003). "Uniform approximations for transcendental functions". Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2667. Springer, Berlin. pp. 780–789. doi:10.1007/3-540-44839-X_82. ISBN 978-3-540-40155-1.
  22. ^ Zeng, Caibin; Chen, Yang Cuan (2015). "Global Padé approximations of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function and its inverse". Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis. 18 (6): 1492–1506. arXiv:1310.5592. doi:10.1515/fca-2015-0086. S2CID 118148950. Indeed, Winitzki [32] provided the so-called global Padé approximation
  23. ^ Winitzki, Sergei (6 February 2008). "A handy approximation for the error function and its inverse".
  24. ^ Press, William H. (1992). Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press. p. 214. ISBN 0-521-43064-X.
  25. ^ Dia, Yaya D. (2023). "Approximate Incomplete Integrals, Application to Complementary Error Function". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4487559. ISSN 1556-5068.
  26. ^ Abreu, Giuseppe (2012). "Very Simple Tight Bounds on the Q-Function". IEEE Transactions on Communications. 60 (9): 2415–2420. Bibcode:2012ITCom..60.2415A. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2012.080612.110075.
  27. ^ a b c Cody, W. J. (March 1993), "Algorithm 715: SPECFUN—A portable FORTRAN package of special function routines and test drivers" (PDF), ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 19 (1): 22–32, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.643.4394, doi:10.1145/151271.151273, S2CID 5621105
  28. ^ Zaghloul, M. R. (1 March 2007), "On the calculation of the Voigt line profile: a single proper integral with a damped sine integrand", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 375 (3): 1043–1048, Bibcode:2007MNRAS.375.1043Z, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11377.x
  29. ^ John W. Craig, A new, simple and exact result for calculating the probability of error for two-dimensional signal constellations Archived 3 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Military Communication Conference, vol. 2, pp. 571–575.
  30. ^ Behnad, Aydin (2020). "A Novel Extension to Craig's Q-Function Formula and Its Application in Dual-Branch EGC Performance Analysis". IEEE Transactions on Communications. 68 (7): 4117–4125. Bibcode:2020ITCom..68.4117B. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2020.2986209. S2CID 216500014.
  31. ^ Carslaw, H. S.; Jaeger, J. C. (1959). Conduction of Heat in Solids (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 484. ISBN 978-0-19-853368-9. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  32. ^ "math.h - mathematical declarations". opengroup.org. 2018. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  33. ^ "Special Functions – GSL 2.7 documentation".

References

[edit]
  • Cuyt, A.; Petersen, V. B.; Verdonk, B.; Waadeland, H.; Jones, W. B. (2008). Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special Functions. Springer Dordrecht. ISBN 978-1-4020-6948-2.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]