Draft talk:Brandback

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Germany

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany

Computing

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Notability improvements and additional independent sources

Hello, and thank you for reviewing this draft.

Following the previous review, I have added several new independent, secondary, and in-depth sources to address the notability concerns raised under WP:GNG. These sources provide substantial editorial coverage of Brandback beyond funding announcements.

Newly added independent sources include:

Vogue Business – full-length analysis on the resale market that references Brandback’s technology and position within the sector.
Habit (Sweden) – an in-depth industry article focused specifically on Brandback and its role in profitable reselling within fashion retail.
Scandinavian Mind – an editorial piece discussing resale infrastructure in which Brandback is referenced as part of broader industry developments.
Green Retail World – independent coverage positioning Brandback within wider retail and commercial resale conversations.

These sources are secondary, reliable, and independent of the company, and they provide the level of depth and analysis requested in the previous AfC decline message.

I have also ensured that all claims in the draft are neutrally worded and attributed to their respective sources in accordance with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies.

As a paid editor, I disclose that I am editing this draft in accordance with WP:PAID and WP:COI and welcome any further feedback or suggestions from independent reviewers.

Thank you for your time and consideration. MaryUnderwood00 (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability updates and draft rewrite

Hello, and thank you for taking the time to review this draft.

Following the previous decline, I have made several updates to address the issues raised around notability and sourcing. The draft has been rewritten manually to ensure a more natural, human style and to remove any language that could appear machine-generated. All claims in the article are now attributed directly to the sources that support them.

To strengthen notability under WP:GNG, I have added several independent and in-depth secondary sources that provide broader coverage of Brandback and its role in the resale and circular commerce sector. These include:

• Vogue Business – an editorial article discussing resale economics in which Brandback’s technology and approach are referenced.

• Habit (Sweden) – a full-length industry report focusing on Brandback’s resale model within fashion retail.

• Scandinavian Mind – an industry analysis piece discussing resale infrastructure and mentioning Brandback in that context.

• Green Retail World – coverage of a retail roundtable that includes Brandback’s technology within wider market discussions.

These sources are editorial, independent of the company, and provide significantly more depth than routine funding announcements. They address the concerns raised in the previous review.

For clarity, I disclose that I am editing on behalf of the company in accordance with WP:COI and WP:PAID. I welcome any further feedback from independent reviewers and am happy to make additional adjustments if needed.

Thank you again for your time and consideration. MaryUnderwood00 (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]