Draft:Starch based packaging

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,164 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Starch based packaging (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 3 days ago by Tanishkajain255 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 3 days ago by Tanishkajain255

Submission declined on 8 May 2025 by S0091 (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by S0091 3 days ago. Last edited by Tanishkajain255 3 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 6 May 2025 by Gheus (talk).

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Declined by Gheus 5 days ago.

Submission declined on 5 May 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk).

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Declined by Pythoncoder 6 days ago.

Comment: See Your first article. S0091 (talk) 14:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Starch-Based Packaging

Starch-based packaging refers to biodegradable materials derived from natural starches such as corn, potato, or tapioca starch. These materials are increasingly used as sustainable alternatives to petroleum-based plastics due to their biodegradability and environmental benefits.

Properties and Manufacturing

Starch-based polymers are created by gelatinizing starch in the presence of plasticizers such as glycerol or sorbitol, resulting in thermoplastic starch (TPS). This material can be processed using conventional plastic manufacturing techniques including extrusion and injection molding. To improve mechanical properties and moisture resistance, TPS is often blended with other biodegradable polymers like polylactic acid (PLA) or reinforced with fillers such as nanoclays or cellulose fibers.^[1]^[2]

Environmental Considerations

Starch-based packaging materials are produced from renewable agricultural sources and are compostable under industrial conditions. Their manufacturing process typically requires less energy compared to petroleum-based plastics, potentially reducing overall carbon emissions. However, large-scale production may lead to increased land use and potential food supply concerns.^[3]

Advantages and Challenges

Advantages:

Derived from renewable resources
Biodegradable and industrially compostable
Potentially lower carbon footprint in production

Challenges:

Poor moisture resistance
Brittle mechanical properties unless blended
Higher production costs than petroleum-based plastics
Shelf-life limitations in humid environments

Current Trends

Global regulations restricting single-use plastics have accelerated interest in starch-based packaging alternatives. Current research aims to enhance material performance, particularly in food packaging, by incorporating nanocomposites, multilayered films, and advanced blending techniques.^[4]^[5]

References

^ Ibrahim et al., "Development of starch-based biodegradable films," Scientific Reports, 2021.
^ Faust et al., "Thermoplastic Starch: A Green Material for Packaging," Polymers Journal, 2020.
^ "Starch-based biodegradable packaging materials: A review of their properties and applications," ScienceDirect, 2021.
^ "Current Research and Applications of Starch-Based Biodegradable Films," PubMed Central, 2022.
^ "Production of Starch-Based Flexible Food Packaging in Developing Countries," PubMed Central, 2024.

[SciRep2021-1] Ibrahim et al., "Development of starch-based biodegradable films," Scientific Reports, 2021.

[Polymers2020-2] Faust et al., "Thermoplastic Starch: A Green Material for Packaging," Polymers Journal, 2020.

[SciDirect2021-3] "Starch-based biodegradable packaging materials: A review of their properties and applications," ScienceDirect, 2021.

[PubMed2022-4] "Current Research and Applications of Starch-Based Biodegradable Films," PubMed Central, 2022.

[PubMed2024-5] "Production of Starch-Based Flexible Food Packaging in Developing Countries," PubMed Central, 2024.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]