Draft:Sample Abundance
| Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,750 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Comment: Sources look like they exist – I've started going through and adding DOI links to them (but haven't done the last half yet). Haven't verified the information they're being cited for because maths/engineering may as well be a foreign language for me, will leave to another reviewer. Nil🥝 02:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Might be AI-generated. Sure is convenient that all the sources are print sources without links… —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Sample abundance is a signal processing paradigm in which very large numbers of low-precision measurements—often one-bit samples produced by comparators with time-varying thresholds—are leveraged to recover signals or parameters with high fidelity and reduced computational cost.[1] Instead of enforcing difficult constraints (e.g., positive-semidefiniteness or low rank) during reconstruction, many problems under sample abundance are reformulated as overdetermined linear feasibility tasks defined by half-space inequalities. With sufficiently many binary measurements, these inequalities confine the solution to a small polyhedral region around the ground truth, making formerly essential constraints unnecessary. Beyond a critical number of samples, the algorithmic load collapses suddenly—a phenomenon referred to as the sample abundance singularity.[2]

Background
[edit]One-bit and few-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) are attractive in applications such as massive MIMO and radar because comparators are inexpensive, fast, and power-efficient. Introducing dither or time-varying thresholds allows binary signs to retain sufficient statistical information for estimation, including covariance and spectrum recovery via generalized arcsine-law results.[3][4] Hybrid architectures such as Unlimited One-Bit Sampling (UNO) combine modulo folding with one-bit thresholds to further increase dynamic range while retaining low hardware cost.[5] Related efforts span low-resolution MIMO channel estimation and radar processing with binary data.[6][7]
Definition
[edit]Let a one-bit sample be obtained by comparing a measurement with a threshold : Each observation yields the linear inequality . Stacking many samples and writing for linear sensing gives the one-bit polyhedron:
- ,
where collects signed rows of and stacks the threshold terms. Under sample abundance (many more inequalities than unknowns), typically has finite volume near the ground truth and shrinks as more samples are added.[1]
Sample abundance singularity
[edit]The sample abundance singularity refers to the observed regime change in which, after a problem-dependent measurement threshold is exceeded, computational requirements collapse from non-convex or constrained programs (e.g., semidefinite or rank-constrained formulations) to simple projections onto linear half-spaces. In this regime, enforcing positive semidefiniteness, rank, or sparsity may become unnecessary because the polyhedral feasible set already localizes the solution to within the desired accuracy.[2][1]
Mathematical formulation and examples
[edit]Phase retrieval
[edit]With quadratic measurements known only through one-bit comparisons to thresholds, each binary sample imposes an inequality in the lifted variable : Beyond ample sampling, explicit PSD and rank-one constraints used by semidefinite programs (e.g., PhaseLift) can be omitted in practice.[2][8]
Low-rank matrix sensing
[edit]For linear measurements , one-bit signs define a polyhedron in the matrix space; with abundant samples, nuclear-norm or rank constraints can become optional to enforce.[9]
Compressed sensing
[edit]Given and signs , the feasible set
can localize a sparse vector without explicit minimization when many binary comparisons are available.[10][11]
Algorithms
[edit]Because sample abundance yields overdetermined systems of linear inequalities, projection methods are natural. The Randomized Kaczmarz algorithm (RKA) selects a row at random and projects the iterate; for consistent systems it converges linearly in expectation at a rate governed by a scaled condition number.[12][13] The Sampling Kaczmarz–Motzkin (SKM) method draws a mini-batch of rows, chooses the most violated constraint, and projects, often accelerating convergence on large systems.[14] Unrolled and plug-and-play variants tailored to one-bit data have also been reported for speed and robustness.[1]
Finite volume property
[edit]The Finite Volume Property (FVP) provides sample-complexity bounds ensuring that the polyhedron formed by one-bit inequalities has small volume (e.g., lies inside an -ball around the truth). For isotropic measurements, one set of results implies that
- samples yield error ,
with improved scaling when the signal belongs to structured sets (e.g., sparse vectors or low-rank matrices) whose Kolmogorov entropies are smaller.[1][15] These guarantees help explain why explicit PSD, rank, or sparsity constraints can become redundant once the number of binary comparisons exceeds a problem-dependent threshold.[1]
Applications
[edit]- Low-resolution receivers in massive MIMO communications and detection.[16]
- Radar and automotive sensing, including covariance-based DOA and one-bit Hankel matrix completion.[17][18]
- Unlimited/one-bit sampling for bandlimited and finite-rate-of-innovation signals, and HDR imaging with sweeping thresholds.[19]
See also
[edit]Quantization (signal processing)
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Needell, Deanna; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). "Harnessing the Power of Sample Abundance: Theoretical Guarantees and Algorithms for Accelerated One-Bit Sensing". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 70 (9): 6690–6713. Bibcode:2024ITIT...70.6690E. doi:10.1109/TIT.2024.3422918.
- ^ a b c Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2022). "One-Bit Phase Retrieval: More Samples Means Less Complexity?". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 70: 4618–4632. doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19372541.
- ^ Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2023). "Covariance Recovery for One-Bit Sampled Stationary Signals with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". Signal Processing. 206 108899. arXiv:2203.09460. Bibcode:2023SigPr.20608899E. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108899.
- ^ Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang (2022). "Covariance Recovery for One-Bit Sampled Non-Stationary Signals with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 70: 5222–5236. Bibcode:2022ITSP...70.5222E. doi:10.1109/TSP.2022.3217379.
- ^ Eamaz, Arian; Mishra, Kumar V.; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). "UNO: Unlimited Sampling Meets One-Bit Quantization". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 72: 997–1014. arXiv:2301.10155. Bibcode:2024ITSP...72..997E. doi:10.1109/TSP.2024.3356253.
- ^ Mezghani, Amine; Swindlehurst, A. Lee (2018). "Blind Estimation of Sparse Broadband Massive MIMO Channels with Ideal and One-Bit ADCs". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 66 (11): 2972–2983. arXiv:1709.06698. Bibcode:2018ITSP...66.2972M. doi:10.1109/TSP.2018.2821640.
- ^ Ameri, Aria; Bose, Arindam; Li, Jian; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2019). "One-Bit Radar Processing with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 67 (20): 5297–5308. arXiv:1911.10170. Bibcode:2019ITSP...67.5297A. doi:10.1109/TSP.2019.2939086.
- ^ Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Needell, Deanna; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2023). One-Bit Quadratic Compressed Sensing: From Sample Abundance to Linear Feasibility. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). doi:10.1109/ISIT54713.2023.10206479.
- ^ Yeganegi, Farhang; Eamaz, Arian; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). Low-Rank Matrix Sensing with Dithered One-Bit Quantization. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). pp. 527–532. doi:10.1109/ISIT57864.2024.10619615.
- ^ Dirksen, Sjoerd; Mendelson, Shahar (2021). "Non-Gaussian Hyperplane Tessellations and Robust One-Bit Compressed Sensing". Journal of the European Mathematical Society. 23 (9): 2913–2947. doi:10.4171/JEMS/1066.
- ^ Xu, Chunlei; Jacques, Laurent (2020). "Quantized Compressive Sensing with RIP Matrices: The Benefit of Dithering". Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA. 9 (3): 543–586. doi:10.1093/imaiai/iaz021.
- ^ Strohmer, Thomas; Vershynin, Roman (2009). "A Randomized Kaczmarz Algorithm with Exponential Convergence". Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications. 15 (2): 262–278. arXiv:math/0702226. Bibcode:2009JFAA...15..262S. doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9030-4.
- ^ Leventhal, Daniel; Lewis, Adrian S. (2010). "Randomized Methods for Linear Constraints: Convergence Rates and Conditioning". Mathematics of Operations Research. 35 (3): 641–654. doi:10.1287/moor.1100.0456.
- ^ De Loera, Jesús A.; Haddock, John; Needell, Deanna (2017). "A Sampling Kaczmarz–Motzkin Algorithm for Linear Feasibility". SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 39 (5): S66 – S87. arXiv:1605.01418. Bibcode:2017SJSC...39S..66D. doi:10.1137/16M1073807.
- ^ Jacques, Laurent; Cambareri, Vittorio (2017). "Time for Dithering: Fast and Quantized Random Embeddings via the Restricted Isometry Property". Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA. 6 (4): 441–476. doi:10.1093/imaiai/iax004.
- ^ Mezghani, Amine; Swindlehurst, A. Lee (2018). "Blind Estimation of Sparse Broadband Massive MIMO Channels with Ideal and One-Bit ADCs". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 66 (11): 2972–2983. arXiv:1709.06698. Bibcode:2018ITSP...66.2972M. doi:10.1109/TSP.2018.2821640.
- ^ Ameri, Aria; Bose, Arindam; Li, Jian; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2019). "One-Bit Radar Processing with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 67 (20): 5297–5308. arXiv:1911.10170. Bibcode:2019ITSP...67.5297A. doi:10.1109/TSP.2019.2939086.
- ^ Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Hu, Yunqiao; Sun, Shunqiao; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). Automotive Radar Sensing with Sparse Linear Arrays Using One-Bit Hankel Matrix Completion. IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf24).
- ^ Eamaz, Arian; Mishra, Kumar V.; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2023). Unlimited Sampling via One-Bit Quantization. International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA).
