Draft:RealEye
Submission declined on 31 December 2025 by Somepinkdude (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 21 December 2025 by AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by AllWeKnowOfHeaven 13 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 2 December 2025 by Monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Monkeysmashingkeyboards 32 days ago.
| |
Comment: Applications section and submitter’s edit summaries have LLM-like writing style —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:25, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: All the papers seem to be just research papers published by the company/employees, and the rest of the sources are primary. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Marthynator (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
 | |
| Company type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | Market Analysis, UX, Neuromarketing, Accessibility, Education |
| Founded | Poland (2017) |
| Headquarters | Warsaw, Poland |
Area served | Worldwide |
Key people | Adam Cellary (Co-founder & CEO) Damian Sromek (Co-founder & CTO) |
| Products | |
| Services | Webcam-based eye-tracking, Survey and behavioral integration |
| Website | www |
RealEye is a Polish software-as-a-service (SaaS) company that provides a browser-based platform for webcam eye-tracking research. It has been used for user-experience (UX) testing, digital marketing studies, and academic research.[1][2]
History
[edit]RealEye was founded in 2017 to offer a lower-cost alternative to traditional hardware-based eye-tracking systems. The company, RealEye Sp. z o.o., was formally registered on 1 March 2019 following funding from SpeedUp Group and Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju (NCBR).[1][2][3]
Technology
[edit]RealEye applies computer vision and deep learning to detect faces and approximate eye position using standard webcams. The platform calculates gaze points and visual attention metrics within the browser and can run on desktops, laptops, tablets, and smartphones without specialized infrared-based hardware.[3][4]
References
[edit]- ^ a b "O tej polskiej firmie mówią na całym świecie. Ich technologia do śledzenia stron w sieci jest 10 razy tańsza od obecnej". INNPoland.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 2025-12-04.
- ^ a b Michalik, Tomasz (2021-08-03). "Sukces w zasięgu wzroku". mycompanypolska.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 2025-12-02.
- ^ a b Polska, Grupa Wirtualna (2018-06-17). "Polski start-up wchodzi na południowoamerykański rynek. Zbada, jak patrzymy na to co nas otacza". Money.pl - portal finansowy (in Polish). Retrieved 2025-12-04.
- ^ Heck, Melanie; Becker, Christian; Deutscher, Viola (2023-01-03). Webcam Eye Tracking for Desktop and Mobile Devices: A Systematic Review. doi:10.24251/HICSS.2023.825. ISBN 978-0-9981331-6-4.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.