Draft:Periodic Table's Historical Evolution

Submission declined on 9 April 2025 by MarcGarver (talk).

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by MarcGarver 47 hours ago. Last edited by Kuru 43 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

The Genesis and Evolution of the Periodic Table: From Ancient Classifications to Modern Understanding The periodic table stands as a monumental achievement in the history of science, a testament to humanity's persistent endeavor to understand and organize the fundamental building blocks of the universe. More than just a chart displayed in chemistry classrooms, it is a comprehensive system that reflects the inherent order within the seemingly diverse world of elements. Its development was not a sudden revelation but rather a gradual process, marked by the contributions of numerous scientists over centuries, each building upon the work of their predecessors. This essay will explore the fascinating historical journey of the periodic table, tracing its origins from the earliest philosophical attempts to classify matter to the sophisticated and theoretically grounded structure we recognize today. The earliest human efforts to understand the composition of matter were rooted in philosophical contemplation rather than empirical experimentation. Ancient civilizations sought to identify the fundamental constituents of the world around them, often based on observable qualities and abstract reasoning. The ancient Greek philosophers, for instance, famously proposed the theory of four classical elements: air, water, earth, and fire.1 These were not conceived as chemical substances in the modern sense but rather as representations of fundamental qualities. Air was associated with hotness and wetness, water with coldness and wetness, earth with coldness and dryness, and fire with dryness and hotness.1 Empedocles is credited with being the first to propose these four as a complete set of fundamental "roots" of all matter.3 Aristotle further elaborated on this concept, linking each element to two of the four sensible qualities.3 This early Greek philosophical framework, though not based on experimental chemistry, represents a significant initial step in conceptualizing the fundamental components of matter, reflecting a basic human desire to find order in the complexity of the natural world. Parallel to the Greek tradition, ancient Indian philosophers also developed a system of fundamental elements. Their concept of the Pancha Mahabhuta, or "five great elements," included earth, water, fire, air, and ether or space.2 This system, found in the Vedas and particularly in Ayurveda, highlights a similar human tendency across different cultures to seek fundamental building blocks of reality. The inclusion of ether as a fifth element, representing space or void, distinguishes it from the Greek model.3 This suggests a universal human curiosity about the nature of existence, expressed through diverse cultural and philosophical lenses. The ancient Egyptians also engaged in classifying matter, often intertwining their understanding with their religious beliefs. Their system frequently involved elements of the universe influenced by gods, such as Sky, Earth, Water, and Mountains.5 Alongside these more philosophical classifications, the Egyptians also developed practical systems for categorizing materials based on their observable properties and uses in their daily lives and crafts. They had distinct classifications for stones (including igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic types), liquid substances (often associated with the hieroglyph for water or containers), and vegetable substances (identified by determinatives for herbaceous plants or trees).5 These practical classifications, driven by the needs of their society and technology, demonstrate a more tangible form of organizing matter based on its immediate characteristics and utility. These early attempts by ancient civilizations, while not scientific in the modern meaning of the term, were crucial precursors to the development of the periodic table. They represent the initial human impulse to organize and understand the natural world, setting the stage for later, more systematic and empirical approaches to classifying the fundamental substances that constitute our reality. The late 18th and early 19th centuries witnessed a pivotal shift in the approach to understanding and classifying elements, moving from philosophical speculation towards systematic observation and measurement. Antoine Lavoisier, a central figure in this transition, is often hailed as the father of modern chemistry.1 In 1789, Lavoisier published a list of 33 "simple substances" which, by modern definition, would largely be considered elements.1 His classification was based on observable properties, grouping these substances into categories such as gases, metals, non-metals, and earths.1 This marked a significant move towards an empirical approach, where observable characteristics rather than abstract philosophical notions became the basis for organizing the fundamental constituents of matter. In the early 19th century, John Dalton, a British scientist, introduced another revolutionary concept: classifying elements based on the relative weights of their atoms.1 In 1806, Dalton proposed that each element was composed of unique atoms with a specific weight relative to hydrogen.1 This idea of classifying elements by a quantitative property – atomic weight – was groundbreaking. It provided a more precise and objective way to distinguish between elements and suggested the possibility of underlying numerical relationships. This concept of relative atomic weight proved to be a crucial foundation for future attempts to organize the elements in a meaningful way. The early 19th century saw further advancements in the classification of elements, most notably through the work of Johann Wolfgang Döbereiner. Between 1817 and 1829, the German chemist observed that certain groups of three elements exhibited similar chemical properties, which he termed "triads".6 Examples of these triads included the alkali metals lithium, sodium, and potassium; the alkaline earth metals calcium, strontium, and barium; and the halogens chlorine, bromine, and iodine.6 Döbereiner made a significant discovery within these triads: the atomic weight of the middle element was approximately the arithmetic mean of the atomic weights of the other two.6 Triad Name Element 1 (Atomic Mass) Element 2 (Atomic Mass) Element 3 (Atomic Mass) Mean of 1 & 3 Alkali-forming elements Lithium (6.9) Sodium (23.0) Potassium (39.1) 23.0 Alkaline-earth-forming elements Calcium (40.1) Strontium (87.6) Barium (137.3) 88.7 Salt-forming elements Chlorine (35.5) Bromine (79.9) Iodine (126.9) 81.2 Acid-forming elements Sulfur (32.1) Selenium (78.9) Tellurium (127.6) 79.9 Iron Triad Iron (55.8) Cobalt (58.9) Nickel (58.7) 57.3

This observation was the first recorded attempt to classify elements based on both similar chemical properties and a quantitative relationship, suggesting an inherent order among these fundamental substances.6 Döbereiner's work provided a crucial clue to other scientists that relative atomic masses were indeed significant when it came to arranging the elements.18 Although limited by the number of elements that could be grouped into triads and the fact that newly discovered elements did not always fit this pattern 10, his contribution laid a foundational step towards the development of the modern periodic table.13 The mid-19th century saw further attempts to organize the growing number of known elements. In the 1860s, the English chemist John Newlands made a significant contribution by arranging the 56 elements known at the time in ascending order of their atomic weights.6 In a paper published in 1865, Newlands observed that every eighth element exhibited similar chemical and physical properties, drawing an analogy to the octaves in music where every eighth note repeats the first.6 For instance, lithium, sodium, and potassium, which are eight elements apart in his arrangement, share similar reactive properties.11 This "Law of Octaves" was a noteworthy attempt to find a periodic relationship among all known elements.28 It provided a basis for classifying elements with similar properties into groups 26 and was logically grounded in the concept of atomic weight.26 However, Newlands' law had several limitations. It only held true for elements up to calcium; beyond that, the pattern of every eighth element with similar properties broke down.11 Furthermore, to maintain his octave pattern, Newlands was sometimes forced to group elements with dissimilar properties together, such as placing iron with oxygen and sulfur.11 The scientific community initially met Newlands' proposal with ridicule, with one professor famously suggesting he might as well have arranged the elements alphabetically.7 Despite its shortcomings and initial lack of acceptance, Newlands' work was a crucial step forward, as it explicitly introduced the concept of periodicity in the properties of elements and attempted to create a comprehensive organizational system based on atomic weight.26 The most significant breakthrough in the history of the periodic table came in 1869 with the work of the Russian chemist Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev.1 Mendeleev, while working on his chemistry textbook, sought a logical way to organize the 63 elements known at the time.34 He arranged the elements in order of increasing atomic weight and grouped them into columns based on their similar chemical properties.7 Mendeleev's genius was not only in recognizing this periodic relationship but also in his willingness to leave gaps in his table for elements that he predicted were yet to be discovered.1 He even went so far as to predict the properties of these "missing" elements. For example, he predicted the existence and properties of an element he called "eka-aluminium," which was later discovered as gallium; "eka-silicon," later discovered as germanium; and "eka-boron," later discovered as scandium.6 Property Eka-Aluminum (Predicted) Gallium (Observed) Eka-Silicon (Predicted) Germanium (Observed) Eka-Boron (Predicted) Scandium (Observed) Atomic Mass 68 amu 69.9 amu 72 amu 72.6 amu 44 amu 45 amu Density (g/cm³) 5.9 5.94 5.5 5.32 - 3.2 Melting Point Low 30.15°C High 938°C - 1541°C Oxide Formula Ea₂O₃ Ga₂O₃ EsO₂ GeO₂ Eb₂O₃ Sc₂O₃ Chloride Formula EaCl₃ GaCl₃ EsCl₄ GeCl₄ EbCl₃ ScCl₃

Furthermore, Mendeleev was not afraid to deviate from the strict order of increasing atomic weight when necessary to place elements with similar properties in the same group, as seen in the case of tellurium and iodine.6 Although initially met with some skepticism 38, the remarkable accuracy of his predictions led to the widespread acceptance of his periodic table and the periodic law, which states that the properties of the elements are a periodic function of their atomic weights.6 The later discovery of the noble gases and their accommodation within his framework further solidified his achievement.7 A crucial refinement to the periodic table came in 1913 with the work of the British physicist Henry Moseley. Through his experiments with X-ray spectroscopy, Moseley discovered a direct relationship between the wavelength of X-rays emitted by an element and its atomic number – the number of protons in the nucleus.6 This discovery provided a more fundamental basis for ordering the elements than atomic weight.6 Arranging the elements by atomic number resolved some of the inconsistencies present in Mendeleev's table, such as the placement of tellurium and iodine, as tellurium has a lower atomic number than iodine despite its slightly higher atomic weight.6 The modern periodic table organizes elements in increasing order of their atomic number.6 The vertical columns, known as groups or families, contain elements with similar chemical properties due to having the same number of valence electrons.6 The horizontal rows are called periods, and the properties of elements change gradually across a period.6 This arrangement continues to exhibit remarkable predictive power, allowing scientists to understand trends in reactivity and even predict the properties of newly synthesized elements.6 The underlying reason for the periodicity observed in the elements lies in their atomic structure and, more specifically, their electron configurations.6 The arrangement of electrons in shells and subshells dictates how an element will interact with other elements. Elements within the same group have similar valence electron configurations, which explains their similar chemical behavior.44 The principles of quantum mechanics, including the Pauli exclusion principle and the Aufbau principle, provide the theoretical framework that explains the filling of atomic orbitals and, consequently, the order of elements in the periodic table.21 This understanding of atomic structure has further refined and validated the modern periodic table.6 In conclusion, the journey of the periodic table from ancient philosophical concepts to the modern, quantum mechanically understood system is a remarkable story of scientific progress. Early attempts to classify matter by the Greeks, Indians, and Egyptians, though rudimentary, laid the initial groundwork for seeking order in the natural world. The first systematic steps by Lavoisier and Dalton, followed by Döbereiner's triads and Newlands' Law of Octaves, progressively incorporated quantitative relationships and the idea of periodicity. Mendeleev's visionary periodic law, based on atomic weight and the prediction of undiscovered elements, marked a pivotal moment. Finally, Moseley's discovery of the significance of atomic number provided the definitive ordering principle, which, coupled with the understanding of atomic structure and electron configuration, led to the modern periodic table we use today. This enduring tool continues to be a cornerstone of chemistry, reflecting the fundamental order within the elements and serving as a testament to the power of scientific inquiry.

References