Draft:Penis size index
Submission declined on 17 February 2025 by Significa liberdade (talk). Neither of the sources provided mention "penis size index", though issues in translation may exist. Further, a Google Scholar search isn't showing any findings for this topic. However, "relative penis size index" appears to discussed in relation to non-human animals (e.g., here, here, and here).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
![]() | The topic of this draft may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (July 2025) |
The Penis Size Index (PSI) is a proposed biometric parameter that quantifies male genital dimensions through geometric modeling. First conceptualized in Chinese andrological research,[1] the index derives from volumetric calculations of penile morphology.
Mathematical Basis
[edit]The PSI models the penis as a conical frustum (truncated cone), with its formula derived from the solid's volume equation:
where:
- h = Length from glans to base (decimeters)
- C = Base circumference (decimeters)
- c = Glans circumference (decimeters)
This formulation omits the constant coefficient (π/12) from the geometric volume formula to create a unitless index.
Classification Standards
[edit]Based on epidemiological data from 27,000 adult males,[1] the classification system is defined as:
PSI Range | Clinical Category |
---|---|
0–1 | Small |
1–3 | Below average |
3–6 | Normal range |
6–8 | Above average |
>8 | Large |
Historical Development
[edit]The index emerged from volumetric comparisons in Wang's 2020 morphological study,[1] which identified strong correlations (r = 0.82) between frustum-model calculations and MRI-measured penile volumes.
Research Applications
[edit]Preliminary applications in Chinese urology include:
- Preoperative planning for hypospadias repair[2]
- Standardization of erectile dysfunction assessments
Criticism
[edit]Controversies persist regarding:
- Ethnic measurement biases in source data
- Non-linear correlation with physiological function
- Limited adoption beyond Chinese medical literature
See Also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c Wang, Cuntong (2020). "Systematic analysis and comparative study of adult penile length and circumference in domestic and international populations". Chinese Journal of Sexual Science. 09: 143–148. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2020.09.035.
- ^ Li, H. (2021). "Volumetric considerations in penile reconstruction". Asian Journal of Andrology. 23 (3): 287–291. doi:10.4103/aja.aja_83_20.
Category:Medical statistics Category:Urology Category:Biometrics