Draft:Navattic
Submission declined on 25 July 2025 by Qcne (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 25 July 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Pythoncoder 17 hours ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 25 July 2025 by Aydoh8 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Aydoh8 17 hours ago. | |
Comment: No independent sources. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 14:44, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Navattic is an American software company that develops a platform for creating interactive product demonstrations. It is headquartered in New York City and was part of Y Combinator’s Winter 2021 startup accelerator cohort.[1]
History
[edit]Navattic was founded in 2020 by Chris Hoyle, Neil McLean, and Randy Frank.[2] In 2021, the company announced it had raised $1.2 million in seed funding led by 645 Ventures.[3] As of 2024, Navattic offers tools for marketing and sales teams to build interactive demos without requiring custom code.[4]
Product
[edit]The Navattic platform allows users to capture and edit user interface screens to produce click-through demonstrations of software products. These are used primarily in sales and marketing contexts.[5] According to independent reviews, the platform includes features such as personalized demo flows, analytics on viewer behavior, and integration with tools such as Salesforce and HubSpot.[6]
Reception
[edit]Industry publications have included Navattic in reviews of interactive demo software. A comparison published by HowdyGo in 2025 cited Navattic's ease of use and integration options, while also noting limitations in customization and mobile responsiveness.[7] A separate review from Arcade highlighted the tool’s ability to build interactive demos without developer support, but raised concerns over pricing tiers and visual design limitations.[8]
References
[edit]- ^ Daso, Frederick (May 6, 2021). "Navattic Raises $1.2M To Augment The Modern Sales Stack". Forbes.
- ^ "Navattic". Y Combinator.
- ^ Daso, Frederick. "Navattic Raises $1.2M To Augment The Modern Sales Stack". Forbes.
- ^ HowdyGo (June 2025). "Walnut vs Navattic – Product demo options for 2025!". HowdyGo.
- ^ "Navattic Review: Key Features, Pricing & Insights (Updated for 2025)". Arcade. March 2025.
- ^ "Walnut vs Navattic – Product demo options for 2025!". HowdyGo. 4 July 2025.
- ^ "Walnut vs Navattic – Product demo options for 2025!". HowdyGo. 4 July 2025.
- ^ "Navattic Review: Key Features, Pricing & Insights (Updated for 2025)". Arcade. March 2025.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.