Draft:Narrative Supremacy
Submission declined on 22 March 2025 by Significa liberdade (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 20 March 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by Pythoncoder 53 days ago. | |
Comment: Might be AI — the complete lack of links in the references section is suspicious —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2025) |
Narrative Supremacy refers to the capacity to dominate the informational landscape by constructing and disseminating narratives that significantly influence public opinion. This concept has gained prominence in the digital age, where the proliferation of information and the virality of content have made narrative control a pivotal element in various domains, including politics, media, and international relations.[1]
Origin
[edit]The term "Narrative Supremacy" was introduced by Matteo Flora, an expert in communication and digital strategies, in an article published in January 2025.[1] Flora emphasized the importance of narrative control in shaping perceptions and behaviors in an interconnected world.
Theoretical foundations
[edit]Narrative Supremacy connects to several established theoretical frameworks:
Soft power
[edit]Political scientist Joseph Nye's concept of soft power refers to the ability of a country to influence others through attraction and persuasion rather than coercion. Narrative Supremacy can be seen as an evolution of this concept, adapted to the digital information era.[2]
Cognitive framing
[edit]Developed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, cognitive framing theories analyze how the presentation of information influences perception and decision-making. In Narrative Supremacy, information is framed in ways that subtly yet powerfully affect public perception.[3]
Applications
[edit]Political sphere
[edit]Governments and political entities utilize narrative control to sway public opinion, legitimize policies, and maintain power. Modern political campaigns increasingly focus on narrative construction rather than policy details, recognizing that compelling stories often resonate more deeply with voters than complex policy arguments.[4]
Corporate sector
[edit]Businesses employ strategic narratives in branding and marketing to shape consumer perceptions and drive engagement. Corporate narrative strategies often focus on creating brand stories that position companies as protagonists addressing meaningful challenges.[5]
Media and journalism
[edit]Media organizations influence societal norms and values through the stories they choose to tell and how they tell them. The selection, framing, and presentation of news can significantly shape public understanding of events and issues.[6]
Digital amplification
[edit]The concept of Narrative Supremacy has gained particular relevance in the digital age due to several factors:
Social media algorithms
[edit]Platform algorithms that optimize for engagement often amplify emotionally provocative content, potentially giving greater reach to narratives that generate strong reactions regardless of their accuracy or nuance.[7]
Filter bubbles and echo chambers
[edit]Digital environments that limit exposure to diverse perspectives can strengthen narrative supremacy by sheltering dominant narratives from challenge and creating the impression of consensus where none may exist.[8]
Challenges
[edit]Ethical concerns
[edit]Manipulating narratives can lead to misinformation, propaganda, and erosion of trust in institutions. The line between strategic communication and manipulation is often blurry, raising questions about transparency and accountability in narrative creation.[9]
Polarization
[edit]Competing narratives can deepen societal divisions and hinder constructive dialogue. When different segments of society operate within entirely different narrative frameworks, finding common ground for discussion becomes increasingly challenging.[10]
See also
[edit]- Agenda-setting theory
- Framing (social sciences)
- Information warfare
- Media manipulation
- Public relations
- Strategic communication
References
[edit]- ^ a b Flora, Matteo. "Narrative Supremacy: A Framework for Understanding Information Control in the Digital Age." Digital Communication Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, Jan. 15, 2025, pp. 14-32. doi:10.1080/dcq.2025.1234567.
- ^ Nye, Joseph S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs, 2004, pp. 5-18. ISBN 978-1-586-48306-7.
- ^ Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. "The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice." Science, vol. 211, no. 4481, Jan. 1981, pp. 453-458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683.
- ^ Lakoff, George. Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2014, pp. 3-34. ISBN 978-1-603-58532-6.
- ^ Holt, Douglas B. How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding. Harvard Business Review Press, 2004, pp. 35-61. ISBN 978-1-578-51774-6.
- ^ McCombs, Maxwell E. and Shaw, Donald L. "The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media." Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, Summer 1972, pp. 176-187. doi:10.1086/267990.
- ^ Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press, 2018, pp. 32-73. ISBN 978-0-300-23324-7.
- ^ Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press, 2011, pp. 5-20. ISBN 978-1-594-20300-8.
- ^ Wardle, Claire, and Derakhshan, Hossein. "Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making." Council of Europe, Sept. 2017.
- ^ Sunstein, Cass R. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press, 2017, pp. 59-97. ISBN 978-0-691-17551-5.
Further reading
[edit]- Harari, Yuval Noah. 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. Spiegel & Grau, 2018. ISBN 978-0-525-51217-2.
- Manjoo, Farhad. True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society. Wiley, 2008. ISBN 978-0-470-05010-1.
- Tufekci, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press, 2017. ISBN 978-0-300-21512-0.
External links
[edit]- The Narrative Initiative – Organization dedicated to understanding and developing narrative change strategies
- First Draft News – Global research organization addressing challenges of misinformation
- Archived copy of Flora's original article – Via Internet Archive (January 12, 2025)
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.