Draft:Mo.co
| Submission declined on 18 April 2025 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 28 March 2025 by Ibjaja055 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Ibjaja055 4 months ago.
| |
Comment: Basically where this falls short is in significant coverage about the topic that's independent of the subject. For games, this usually takes the form of review reception. Are there sources that have discussed or reviewed the ARG? Unfortunately that a game received many downloads isn't in itself a great indicia for notability. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. Pirateplh (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
mo.co is a cooperative mobile action role-playing game (ARPG) developed and published by the Finnish company Supercell.[1]
Gameplay
In mo.co, players join a fictional startup dedicated to hunting Chaos Monsters that have invaded Earth from parallel worlds.[2] Players can choose to embark on solo missions or team up with others to tackle various challenges. The game features a diverse array of weapons, gadgets, and passive abilities, allowing for extensive customization of playstyles. Additionally, players can personalize their characters with various outfits and accessories.[3]
Development and Release
Supercell announced mo.co on October 10, 2023, highlighting its innovative portal technology that enables travel to parallel worlds. The game's beta testing phase commenced in late October 2023, initially targeting Android users in the United States. Following a year and a half of development and refinement, the game was globally launched on March 18, 2025.[4]
Reception
Upon its release, mo.co experienced significant success, amassing approximately 2.5 million downloads and generating around $570,000 in player spending within its first week. The United States led in revenue generation, while Germany topped the charts in total downloads.[5] The game received praise for its dynamic gameplay and cooperative multiplayer features.
References
[edit]- ^ "Mo.Co reinvents online RPGs with classic Supercell spirit". pocketgamer.biz. 11 April 2025.
- ^ "mo.co Review: Glorious Chaos Meets Co-Op Brilliance". GamingOnPhone. 15 April 2025.
- ^ "Mo.co: What to Know About Supercell's New Fantasy, Monster-Hunting Game". Mobile Matters. 20 March 2025.
- ^ "Supercell's mo.co launches today as studio's seventh global game - but there's a catch". pocketgamer.biz. 18 March 2025.
- ^ "Supercell's New Game Mo.co Achieves More Than 2.5 million Downloads In First Week". Esports.net. 27 March 2025.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.