Draft:Kavanaugh Stop
| Submission declined on 25 October 2025 by Carolina2k22 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
| Submission declined on 3 October 2025 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Dan arndt 32 days ago.
|
Comment: Potentially could be merged into an article on the actual court case itself? Carolina2k22 • (talk) 12:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
A Kavanaugh stop in the United States allows immigration officers to briefly detain a person based on a person’s “apparent ethnicity” as a “relevant factor” when deciding whether to arrest or detain them. [1] Previously, when immigration officers stop and search a pedestrian, they were prohibited from considering physical appearance and language use, among other factors, when deciding to stop and question people about possible immigration law violations. [2] Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s separate concurrence in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo suggests that the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution permits race-based immigration policing, otherwise colloquially known as "racial profiling." [3] The Fourth Amendment allows government officials to briefly stop and question someone without first obtaining a warrant based on “reasonable suspicion” that the person is engaging in illegal activity. The official “must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.”
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote that the court’s order permits government officials to target people who “look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little."[1]
References
[edit]- ^ a b "KRISTI NOEM, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. v. PEDRO VASQUEZ PERDOMO, ET AL., 606 U. S. ____ (2025)" (PDF). United States Supreme Court Government. Retrieved October 2, 2025.
- ^ "Terry Frisk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions. Chapter 9: Civil Rights Action—42 U.S.C. § 1983. Revised August 2023". US Courts Government Web. Retrieved October 2, 2025.
- ^ "Justice Brett Kavanaugh and racial proxies". SCOTUS Blog. 23 September 2025. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
