Draft:Ethical Neural Networks
Submission declined on 16 April 2025 by NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2025) |
{{AI ethics}}
Ethical Neural Networks are a proposed class of artificial neural networks (ANNs) designed to incorporate ethical reasoning and moral constraints into their computational models. As a conceptual development in AI ethics and machine learning, ethical neural networks aim to ensure that AI systems can make decisions that are not only intelligent, but also ethically aligned with human values.[1]
History
[edit]The concept emerged in the early 2020s as part of growing concerns over AI systems making decisions that were biased, opaque, or harmful. While fields such as machine ethics and AI alignment had already explored the moral behavior of machines, the notion of building ethical reasoning directly into neural network architecture represented a new research direction [1].
Definition and Key Features
[edit]Ethical neural networks are not a single model but a family of designs that share the goal of integrating moral reasoning into machine learning. Key characteristics include:
- Ethical constraints embedded in training objectives or network design.
- Multi-objective optimization balancing task performance and moral considerations.
- Normative frameworks, such as deontological or utilitarian ethics, used as guiding principles.
- Interpretability features to explain decisions in ethical terms.
Applications
[edit]Although mostly theoretical, ethical neural networks are relevant to various fields:
- Autonomous Vehicles: Handling ethically complex scenarios (e.g., pedestrian dilemmas) [2].
- Healthcare: Supporting clinical decisions that balance outcomes and patient autonomy.
- Content Moderation: Applying ethical guidelines to detect or filter harmful content.
- Human-AI Interaction: Programming social robots to make moral judgments in caregiving or education.
Challenges
[edit]Ethical neural networks raise several theoretical and practical challenges:
- Value pluralism: Ethics varies across cultures and individuals, complicating universal design.
- Model transparency: Neural networks often lack explainability, especially in moral reasoning.
- Responsibility: Delegating ethical decisions to machines raises questions about accountability.
- Data limitations: Lack of high-quality, ethically annotated datasets for training.
Criticism
[edit]Some critics argue that embedding ethics into algorithms may:
- Create illusions of moral agency where none exists.
- Be manipulated to justify controversial decisions.
- Oversimplify complex moral dilemmas into rigid rule-based models.
Future Research
[edit]Research in ethical neural networks is growing, often intersecting with fields like:
Ongoing efforts include the development of moral reasoning benchmarks, hybrid symbolic-connectionist models, and collaborations between ethicists and AI developers.[2]
Related Concepts
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Gabriel, Iason (2020-09-01). "Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment". Minds and Machines. 30 (3): 411–437. doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2. ISSN 1572-8641.
- ^ Bonnefon, Jean-François; Shariff, Azim; Rahwan, Iyad (2016-06-24). "The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles". Science. 352 (6293): 1573–1576. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2654. ISSN 0036-8075.
Further Reading
[edit]- Binns, Reuben. "Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy." In *Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency* (FAT*), 2018. [1]
- Cowls, Josh; Floridi, Luciano. "Prolegomena to a White Paper on an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society." SSRN, 2018. [2]
- Greene, Joshua D. *Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them*. Penguin Press, 2013. [3]
Citations and Sources
[edit]To provide more reliable references and verify the claims made in this article, additional academic articles and conference proceedings are required. Some key sources to consider for further validation:
- Bonnefon, Jean-François, et al. "The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles," *Science*, 2016 [2].
- Gabriel, Iason. "Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment," *Minds and Machines*, 2020 [1].
- Cowls, Josh, et al. "Ethical Artificial Intelligence," *Journal of AI and Ethics*, 2022 [3].
- Binns, Reuben. "Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy," *FAT* 2018 [4].
Category:Artificial neural networks Category:Ethics of artificial intelligence Category:Emerging technologies Category:Philosophy of artificial intelligence