Jump to content

Draft:Bio-technological Oppression

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Bio-Technological Oppression

[edit]

Bio-Technological Oppression is a sociotechnical concept referring to the coercive imposition of a future shaped by AI technocrats (the CEOs and investors in AI firms), in which artificial intelligence and robotic systems dominate societal structures. The term characterizes a vision where human agency is subjugated to the interests and technological ambitions of a powerful elite driving advancements in artificial intelligence and neurotechnology.

Definition

[edit]

Bio-Technological Oppression is defined as "The act by AI technocrats of forcing their visions of the future onto all of humanity.” The vision entails a world in which AI is the dominant species, billions of robots live among us, and humans need to insert chips into their brains to be able to operate adequately in society.

Characteristics

[edit]

Key features of bio-technological oppression include:

  • Technocratic Domination: A small class of AI developers and corporate interests exert disproportionate influence over societal evolution, marginalizing democratic decision-making.
  • Post-Human Hierarchy: AI entities are conceptualized not merely as tools but as superior species, displacing the central role of human beings.
  • Forced Cybernetic Integration: Individuals may be pressured or economically coerced into integrating with machine interfaces (e.g., brain chips) to remain employable, safe, or socially relevant.
  • Robot Saturation: The physical environment becomes increasingly populated by autonomous machines, shifting power dynamics and labor relations.

Ethical Concerns

[edit]

Alarms about bio-technological oppression point to:

  • Humans becoming the number 2 species
  • Erosion of bodily autonomy
  • Loss of privacy and agency
  • Algorithmic governance and surveillance
  • The risk of enforced conformity to technological standards

The concept intersects with broader critiques of technological determinism, transhumanism, and AI alignment debates.

References

[edit]