Draft:Benjamin Bloom
| Submission declined on 22 October 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Benjamin Bloom instead.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Benjamin Bloom-Introduction
[edit]Benjamin Samuel Bloom (February 21, 1913 – September 13, 1999) was an American educational psychologist best known for categorizing educational objectives and for his work on mastery learning. His most influential contribution is Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,.[1] a framework that continues to shape curriculum planning, instructional material development, and student assessment worldwide. Bloom’s ideas about Mastery Learning and the 2-Sigma Problem also had a lasting impact on educational practice and research[2][3]. His conviction that virtually every student can achieve high levels of learning under optimal conditions remains a foundational principle in contemporary education.[4]
Personal Life & Biography
[edit]Benjamin Samuel Bloom was born on February 21, 1913, in Lansford, Pennsylvania, to Jewish immigrants.  His parents fostered a deep respect for education and its transformative potential. From an early age Bloom showed a strong interest in academic questions about how people learn.
He earned a bachelor’s degree from Pennsylvania State University in 1935 and a master’s degree there in 1937.[5] He completed his Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Educational Psychology at the University of Chicago in 1942. His doctoral work laid the foundation for his long-term studies of cognitive development and learning processes.[6].
Bloom spent most of his professional life at the University of Chicago, where colleagues regarded him as thoughtful, modest, and deeply committed to expanding educational opportunities. Outside academia he was known for his humility and integrity.  He argued that intelligence is not fixed but can be developed through appropriate instruction.[7] He died in 1999, leaving a legacy that profoundly influenced how educators design and assess learning worldwide.[3]
Education & Academic Career
[edit]Bloom commenced his professional journey at the University of Chicago as a member of the Board of Examiners before transitioning to teaching within the Department of Education. [5] His initial focus on evaluating student performance outcomes led him to undertake an ambitious initiative aimed at classifying educational objectives, a venture that would ultimately revolutionize teaching methodologies.
Development of Bloom's Taxonomy
[edit]In collaboration with fellow educators in 1956, Bloom published "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain," widely recognized as Bloom’s Taxonomy.[5] This taxonomy organized learning outcomes into three domains: cognitive, affective,  and psychomotor with particular emphasis on cognitive development. It identified six hierarchical levels within cognitive learning: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. This framework encouraged educators to design instructional experiences that transcended rote memorization by promoting advanced problem-solving skills.[5] The taxonomy quickly became integral to curriculum development and remains frequently cited in teacher training programs worldwide.
In 2001, former students Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl revised Bloom's Taxonomy for contemporary relevance by restructuring its levels into Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating, while preserving its conceptual clarity and adopting more dynamic language suitable for today’s learners.[4]
Mastery Learning.
[edit]Bloom introduced his theory of Mastery Learning in 1968, proposing that nearly all students can reach high levels of achievement if they are given sufficient time, effective instruction, and constructive feedback.[2] He argued that observed differences in student performance often reflect variations in instructional quality or access to learning opportunities rather than immutable aptitude. In Learning for Mastery, Bloom emphasized frequent formative assessments to identify learning difficulties quickly so instruction can be adjusted, an approach that influenced personalized instruction and differentiated teaching practices.[2]
The '2-Sigma Problem'
[edit]In 1984, Bloom published findings from what became known as the '2-Sigma Problem' which revealed that students receiving one-on-one tutoring performed two standard deviations better, placing them within the top percentiles compared to those taught within traditional classroom settings.[3] This discovery sparked global interest regarding methodologies approximating individualized instruction within smaller classroom environments. The effect size associated with this phenomenon has since been regarded as an ideal benchmark within educational research while continuing to shape adaptive learning frameworks along technology-assisted models.[3]
Contributions to Educational Reform
[edit]Beyond research, Bloom actively participated in efforts directed toward reforming education systems. He held positions on various national and international education committees, worked towards standardizing curriculum, and emerged as one among earlier advocates promoting empirical evaluation methods to assess educational progress.[8] Furthermore, Bloom played an influential role developing assessment systems impacting global organizations such as UNESCO alongside Educational Testing Services.[9]
Publications
[edit]- Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. (Bloom et. al., 1956) : This historical text established principles guiding orderly instructional presentations still referenced today. [5]
- Learning for Mastery. (Bloom,1968): Articulated essential aspects related to mastery learning, advocating techniques ensuring that every learner attains proficiency before moving forward.[2]
- Mastery Learning: Theory & Practice. (Bloom, 1971): Explored the implementation of mastery principles in classrooms, discussing implications for teacher training and equity issues.[10]
- The '2-Sigma Problem.' (Bloom, 1984): Highlighted how individualized instruction yields substantial improvements for struggling learners, prompting re-evaluation of traditional pedagogical approaches.[3]
- Collaborative Taxonomy Publication and related Handbooks. (Bloom et. al, 1956): A collective effort serving key reference material for teacher training and instructional design.[11]
Revision & Ongoing Usage
[edit]Anderson and Krathwohl’s 2001 revision shifted the taxonomy from noun-based categories to verb-based processes, emphasizing active cognitive processes in learning. That revision remains central to lesson planning and outcome-based assessment and has influenced many derivative models, including digital curriculum mapping and instructional design. [9] [4]
Impact on Education
[edit]The enduring influence exerted by Benjamin Bloom spans extensive realms, including educational psychology, curriculum development, and policies that aid educators in clarifying goals, measuring comprehension and fostering critical thinking skills.
Impact on Educational Psychology
[edit]By bridging gaps between psychological theory and practical pedagogy, Bloom demonstrated how the study of cognition studies informs actionable strategies implemented by teachers.[12] His foundational classification foundation continues to shape teacher training and mastery learning principles prevalent today.
Global Reach
[edit]Globally, Bloom's contributions resonate across diverse educational contexts in Europe, Africa, and Latin America,[8] with international assessments like PISA and TIMSS relying upon interpretations rooted in Bloom's cognitive framework, which prioritizes application over mere recall.[9]
Critiques acknowledge limitations concerning hierarchical structures, which may oversimplify the complexities of cognition.[4] However, despite such critiques, the taxonomy continues to serve vital functions in underpinning curriculum developments and evaluations both in offline and online settings.
Enduring Legacy
[edit]At its core, Bloom's philosophy asserts that with sufficient time and quality instruction, every student can master subject matter. This belief underpins many modern pedagogical approaches linking, linking individualization, formative assessments, and data-driven methodologies, and continues to inspire educator preparation and research endeavors world-wide.
References
[edit]- ^ Wiggins, Jerry S. (1965). "Book Reviews : Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain by David R. Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, and Bertram B. Masia. New York: David McKay Company, 1964. Pp. vii + 196". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 25 (3): 895–897. doi:10.1177/001316446502500324. ISSN 0013-1644.
- ^ a b c d Lafendry, Ferdinal (2023-02-08). "Teori Pendidikan Tuntas Mastery Learning Benyamin S Bloom". Tarbawi : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam. 6 (1): 1–12. doi:10.51476/tarbawi.v6i1.459. ISSN 2715-4777.
- ^ a b c d e Bloom, Benjamin S. (1984). "The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring". Educational Researcher. 13 (6): 4–16. doi:10.2307/1175554. ISSN 0013-189X. JSTOR 1175554.
- ^ a b c d KRATHWOHL, DAVID R.; ANDERSON, LORIN W. (2010-01-21). "Merlin C. Wittrock and the Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy". Educational Psychologist. 45 (1): 64–65. doi:10.1080/00461520903433562. ISSN 0046-1520.
- ^ a b c d e Michael, William B.; Coffman, William E. (1956). "Book Reviews : Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, by Benjamin S. Bloom (ed.). New York: Longmans, Green and Company, I956. 207 pp. $I.50". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 16 (3): 401–405. doi:10.1177/001316445601600310. ISSN 0013-1644.
- ^ Michael, William B.; Coffman, William E. (1956). "Book Reviews : Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, by Benjamin S. Bloom (ed.). New York: Longmans, Green and Company, I956. 207 pp. $I.50". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 16 (3): 401–405. doi:10.1177/001316445601600310. ISSN 0013-1644.
- ^ Bloom, Benjamin S. (1987). "A Response to Slavin's Mastery Learning Reconsidered". Review of Educational Research. 57 (4): 507–508. doi:10.2307/1170434. ISSN 0034-6543. JSTOR 1170434.
- ^ a b "Benjamin Bloom", Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre (in Spanish), 2024-04-27, retrieved 2025-10-21
- ^ a b c "Bloom's Taxonomy", The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018, doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n86, ISBN 978-1-5063-2615-3, retrieved 2025-10-22
- ^ EMRICK, JOHN A. (1971). "AN EVALUATION MODEL FOR MASTERY TESTING1". Journal of Educational Measurement. 8 (4): 321–326. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00946.x. ISSN 0022-0655.
- ^ Wiggins, Jerry S. (1965). "Book Reviews : Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain by David R. Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, and Bertram B. Masia. New York: David McKay Company, 1964. Pp. vii + 196". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 25 (3): 895–897. doi:10.1177/001316446502500324. ISSN 0013-1644.
- ^ Akpan, Ben (2025), "Mastery Learning—Benjamin Bloom", Science Education in Theory and Practice, Springer Texts in Education, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 143–156, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81351-1_9, ISBN 978-3-031-81350-4, retrieved 2025-10-22