Draft:AWvi
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,786 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 20 October 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. PalladioNotes (talk) 07:14, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
AWvi (pronounced AWE-vee) is an Italian longevity brand that develops health and wellness products based on physiological science. The company was established by professionals with backgrounds in biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and medicine.
The brand's first product line, The Skin Method, launched in 2024 and centres on skin care. This protocol is covered by European patent P.P. EP4151217[1] and was tested in a randomised, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled clinical study.[2]
The system combines one oral supplement with three topical products. According to the company, these are designed to support skin barrier function, microbial balance, hydration, and inflammatory response. Production takes place in Italy.
AWvi's methodology emphasises working with the body's existing biology, particularly the skin microbiome. The brand has been mentioned in several publications, including Women's Health UK,[3] The Telegraph,[4] Marie Claire UK,[5] Harper's Bazaar UK,[6] Sheerluxe,[7] and the Evening Standard.[8]
References
[edit]- ^ European Patent Office. "EP4151217A1: Combined oral probiotic and topical composition for prevention or treatment of gut–skin dysbiosis and related skin diseases." Google Patents. Accessed October 2025.
- ^ Nobile, Valeria et al. "Skin Antiaging and Skin Health Benefits of Probiotic Intake Combined with Topical Ectoin and Sodium Hyaluronate." Cosmetics, 12 (2): 34. 2025.
- ^ "What Is Ectoin and Why Is It in So Many Skincare Products?" Women's Health UK.
- ^ "Beauty Trends 2024" The Telegraph.
- ^ "What Is Ectoin?" Marie Claire UK.
- ^ "Best Ectoin Skincare Products" Harper's Bazaar UK.
- ^ "March Beauty Launches" Sheerluxe.
- ^ "Best New Beauty Launches, March 2024" Evening Standard.
{{Draft categories Category:Italian brands Category:Personal care brands Category:Health care brands }}
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.