Discrete probability distribution
Conway–Maxwell–binomialParameters |
 |
---|
Support |
 |
---|
PMF |
 |
---|
CDF |
 |
---|
Mean |
Not listed |
---|
Median |
No closed form |
---|
Mode |
See text |
---|
Variance |
Not listed |
---|
Skewness |
Not listed |
---|
Excess kurtosis |
Not listed |
---|
Entropy |
Not listed |
---|
MGF |
See text |
---|
CF |
See text |
---|
In probability theory and statistics, the Conway–Maxwell–binomial (CMB) distribution is a three parameter discrete probability distribution that generalises the binomial distribution in an analogous manner to the way that the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution generalises the Poisson distribution. The CMB distribution can be used to model both positive and negative association among the Bernoulli summands,.[1][2]
The distribution was introduced by Shumeli et al. (2005),[1] and the name Conway–Maxwell–binomial distribution was introduced independently by Kadane (2016) [2] and Daly and Gaunt (2016).[3]
Probability mass function
[edit]
The Conway–Maxwell–binomial (CMB) distribution has probability mass function

where
,
and
. The normalizing constant
is defined by

If a random variable
has the above mass function, then we write
.
The case
is the usual binomial distribution
.
Relation to Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution
[edit]
The following relationship between Conway–Maxwell–Poisson (CMP) and CMB random variables [1] generalises a well-known result concerning Poisson and binomial random variables. If
and
are independent, then
.
Sum of possibly associated Bernoulli random variables
[edit]
The random variable
may be written [1] as a sum of exchangeable Bernoulli random variables
satisfying

where
. Note that
in general, unless
.
Generating functions
[edit]
Let

Then, the probability generating function, moment generating function and characteristic function are given, respectively, by:[2]



For general
, there do not exist closed form expressions for the moments of the CMB distribution. Having said that, the following mathematical relationship holds:[3]
Let
denote the falling factorial. If
, where
, then
![{\displaystyle \operatorname {E} [((Y)_{r})^{\nu }]={\frac {C_{n-r,p,\nu }}{C_{n,p,\nu }}}((n)_{r})^{\nu }p^{r}\,,}](/media/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8955a48a7ec9075664e225fcb1e4cc55f83e545d)
for
.
Let
and define

Then the mode of
is
if
is not an integer. Otherwise, the modes of
are
and
.[3]
Stein characterisation
[edit]
Let
, and suppose that
is such that
and
. Then [3]
![{\displaystyle \operatorname {E} [p(n-Y)^{\nu }f(Y+1)-(1-p)Y^{\nu }f(Y)]=0.}](/media/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/2f97a7936458181eee3284350aa0024734257338)
Approximation by the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution
[edit]
Fix
and
and let
Then
converges in distribution to the
distribution as
.[3] This result generalises the classical Poisson approximation of the binomial distribution.
Conway–Maxwell–Poisson binomial distribution
[edit]
Let
be Bernoulli random variables with joint distribution given by

where
and the normalizing constant
is given by

where

Let
. Then
has mass function

for
. This distribution generalises the Poisson binomial distribution in a way analogous to the CMP and CMB generalisations of the Poisson and binomial distributions. Such a random variable is therefore said [3] to follow the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson binomial (CMPB) distribution. This should not be confused with the rather unfortunate terminology Conway–Maxwell–Poisson–binomial that was used by [1] for the CMB distribution.
The case
is the usual Poisson binomial distribution and the case
is the
distribution.
- ^ a b c d e Shmueli G., Minka T., Kadane J.B., Borle S., and Boatwright, P.B. "A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 54.1 (2005): 127–142.[1]
- ^ a b c Kadane, J.B. " Sums of Possibly Associated Bernoulli Variables: The Conway–Maxwell–Binomial Distribution." Bayesian Analysis 11 (2016): 403–420.
- ^ a b c d e f Daly, F. and Gaunt, R.E. " The Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution: distributional theory and approximation." ALEA Latin American Journal of Probabability and Mathematical Statistics 13 (2016): 635–658.