Welcome to the computing section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.

Select a section:

WP:RD/C

Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

How can I get my question answered?

Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

Ready? Ask a new question!

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

May 22

What is the computational power Q of the world's best N=16-Rechenwerk device?

What is the computational power Q of the world's best N=16-Rechenwerk device? For the meaning of the word "N=16-Rechenwerk", please see German Wikipedia de:Wikipedia:Auskunft/Archiv/2025/Woche_19#Für_eine_gegebene_natürliche_Zahl_N:_Wie_nennt_man_ein_technisches_Gerät,_das_die_in_dieser_Frage_beschriebene_mathematische_Funktion_möglichst_effizient_berechnen_kann?! 2003:ED:B722:800:B46D:A520:F44C:58CF (talk) 11:49, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edited a link. --CiaPan (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to tell, because the speed of supercomputers like El Capitan is typically given in FLOPS, which is not relevant here. In one step there seem to be two fetches and a store. They are mostly of consecutive locations, so a pipeline architecture will accelerate that, but I think memory access will be the bottleneck; much of the arithmetic can be implemented efficiently as bitwise operations. It looks that with some analysis the computation process can also be parallelized. On a single core, one step may take maybe 10 ns, so 10 million cores can do perhaps 10¹⁵ steps per second. For the about 10⁶ steps needed for N = 16, this would then take one nanosecond. Note that this is at best a ballpark figure; it may be off by orders of magnitude. ‑‑Lambiam 16:57, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 23

Just my concern about Analytic geometry

block evasion

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

This picture in this article Analytic geometry#/media/File:Stereographic projection in 3D.svg can be changed to this rather, https://drive.google.com/file/d/11LIxCSDGHHScIrgrJOX-6MfiDE4nS6D4/view?usp=sharing. Unfortunately, that cannot be done as I've said, as the picture I'm referring is from the cine world, I mean the cinema as because

Concerning analytic geometry I think this topic which was added earlier - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAnalytic_geometry&diff=712799894&oldid=712292654 is somewhat relevant in this Talk:Analytic_geometry which was closed and got removed from the Talk Page. He'd gone little outrageous and he made his addition to this talk page which is gibberish, so it got removed. However by Conic Sections we cannot intrude our own world, as, coz, because it is just in 2D. First of all 3D is different. Prior to make our own assumptions on String Theory, we must speculate clearly as because Conic Sections and this analytic geometry sees things that is in / on only in 2D aspect as we know, so it is very dangerous if at all if it is applied to 3D object, clear analysis and clear speculation is very much required before we approach

Editorial team please accord by so and make necessary edits in this Article - Analytic Geometry.

— ~~~~
User:AtTEnigma (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a question here? Wikipedia has no editorial team. See Wikipedia:About. The image in the article is that of the infobox Template:General geometry, found on many articles on geometric topics, Absolute geometry, Bernhard Riemann, Circumference, ..., Zero-dimensional space. In no way is it meant to be specific to analytic geometry – although analytic geometry is a useful tool for working out the equations of the stereographic projection. ‑‑Lambiam 16:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then I suggest that the image doesn't belong in that template, as it misleads the reader into thinking that it's relevant to the specific geometrical topic. In fact, based that's not an infobox, it's a navbox that's being placed like an infobox. (Opinion ends.) --142.112.140.58 (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 27

Re: Fandom

The WP article states that Jimmy Wales (who everyone already knows co-founded the platform we're on now) remained on this farm's staff as late as 2018. Per Fandom's own About page, just wanted to make sure if he's still with them in the current TPG era. (H/T this overview at Shout's Anti-Wikia Alliance [AWA].)

(DISCLOSURE: This contributor was a former Wikian, but has long since moved on^{currently on Miraheze}.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 21:10, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 3

Spellcheck dictionary in Duckduckgo

I have recently swapped to Duckduckgo as my browser. It took me a while to get it to even run an automatic spellcheck on what I typed, and I'm not sure now how I achieved that. Now though I want to add words to the spellchecker's dictionary. How can I do that? HiLo48 (talk) 01:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HiLo48: Which spellchecker are you using? Duckmather (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duckmather I have no idea. How do I find out? (I haven't found the Settings part of Duckduckgo very friendly or intuitive at all.) HiLo48 (talk) 04:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HiLo48 You might do better to ask in a specialist forum, such as [1] Shantavira|^{feed me} 17:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]