Jump to content

Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Valued image candidates)

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
59,081 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 53,268 (90.2%) 
Undecided
  
 3,268 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
 2,545 (4.3%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-25 10:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Dacnis cayana glaucogularis (Blue dacnis) female
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2025-05-26 00:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Tugboat, Charles H. Cates IV – MMSI 316005724 – starboard (right) view
Reason:
Best starboard view of this ship by name. -- GRDN711 (talk)
  •  Question Does a port as well as a starboard view add value? There's no significant difference is there? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @Charlesjsharp: Yes, there is. Ships are not as symmetrical or produced cookie cutter as other means of transport such as cars. Even birds and insects are, for the most part, right-to-left symmetrical (but not always top-to-bottom).
With ships, there are always differences of one side to the other, particularly on older ones. In this case, asymmetrical elements include the rear deck cut-outs, winch equipment on deck, and the placement of the radar, red/green navigation lights, safety buoys, axe and search lights.
I generally favor one VI per ship-by-name. However, for this working tug, I had two images of merit that were distinctly different. One is the closer port-side-view in good light, and this wider starboard view illustrating many elements of this tug at work. Decided to nominate both. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:33, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-26 19:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Cardellina canadensis (Canada warbler) male

 Comment With 227 images in the linked CAT, it will be helpful to create a sub-cat for males. --Tagooty (talk) 08:36, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I would love to create male and female but immature males and females are quite similar and so this is unwise. Could do mature males, but couldn't put all the images there. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-27 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Hirundinea ferruginea sclateri (Cliff flycatchers) resting on a cliff
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-28 09:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Hylophylax punctulatus (Dot-backed antbird) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-28 09:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Glaucidium brasilianum ucayalae (Ferruginous pygmy-owl) rufous morph

New SSP category created. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-05-29 08:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet liberators in Krasnopilka (Uman Raion)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-05-29 08:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Krasnopilka (Uman Raion)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-05-29 12:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Grussenheim
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-05-29 12:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Église de l'Exaltation-de-la-Sainte-Croix de Grussenheim
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2025-05-29 12:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Jacques Church in Mohammedia during the 20th century
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-29 20:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Thalurania furcata viridipectus (Fork-tailed woodnymph) male
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-29 20:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Thalurania furcata viridipectus (Fork-tailed woodnymph) male in flight
promoted
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-29 20:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Schistes geoffroyi geoffroyi (Geoffroy's daggerbill) male

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2025-05-29 20:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Geiranger – IMO 7816408
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2025-05-29 20:45 (UTC)
Scope:
LED emission spectra
Reason:
This language-independent image is the only image in Commons that shows shows the spectra emmitted by different LEDs quoting both wavelength (λ) and energy levels (eV). The energy levels indicate the minimum operating voltage for that particular LED. -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-05-30 04:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Flowers of a Rhododendron schlippenbachii in the gardens of Hortus Haren (Groningen).
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-05-30 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Sebastian in terracotta by Giovanni Marchiori - Museo civico di Santa Caterina (Treviso)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-05-30 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhagastis acuta - Male, ventral side
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-05-30 06:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Memorial sign to victims of Holodomor in Krasnopilka (Uman Raion)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-05-30 06:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Maksymivka (Uman Raion)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-05-30 08:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Portal of Hospice Comtesse (Lille), view from rue de la Monnaie (Fr)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-30 13:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Myiodynastes hemichrysus minor (Golden-bellied flycatcher)

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 08:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-30 13:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Chalcothraupis ruficervix leucotis (Golden-naped tanager)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-30 13:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Chalcothraupis ruficervix leucotis (Golden-naped tanager) showing back feathers
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-05-30 15:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Canal des Jésuites, view in Regional Prefecture, (Lille)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-05-31 04:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Julianapark, Bolsward Statue of M. Meijer made in 1913. (National Monument).
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-05-31 04:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Landscape with some monks and a small church by Francesco Zuccarelli - Pinacotheque Egidio Martini
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-05-31 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Echeveria 'Pulv Oliver'- inflorescence.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-05-31 07:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Maksymivka (Uman Raion)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-05-31 07:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet prisoners of war in Palanka, Uman Raion
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-31 07:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Chrysuronia oenone oenone (Golden-tailed sapphire) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-31 07:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Chrysuronia oenone oenone (Golden-tailed sapphire) male in flight
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-31 07:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Heliodoxa aurescens (Gould's jewelfront) male in flight
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-05-31 08:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Kavaratty, Nilgiris district - view from southeast above
Used in:
wikidata:Q131349450
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-05-31 08:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Malikorai, Nilgiris district - view from south
Used in:
wikidata:Q131349470
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-05-31 08:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Econy, Nilgiris district - view from the east
Used in:
wikidata:Q134613575
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-05-31 10:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Coats of arms of Joan of Constantinople on the wall of the Saint-Pierre mill, view from rue de la Monnaie
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-31 14:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de Beynac - Historical kitchen
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-05-31 15:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Modernist house SDEZ, (Lambersart), view from Av. de l'Hippodrome
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-01 04:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Christ deposed by Giovanni Marchiori - Museo civico di Santa Caterina (Treviso)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-01 04:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Spiraea cantoniensis(Reeve's spiraea) - immature inflorescences.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-06-01 04:46 (UTC)
Scope:
View from Motta Naluns on Alps in the clouds above Ardez.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-01 07:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Palanka, Uman Raion
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-01 07:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Palanka, Uman Raion

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 16:40, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-01 16:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi Q5 Sportback GU - left front view
Used in:
de:Audi Q5 GU Sportback, de:Audi, de:Audi Q5 Sportback, de:Audi Q5 GU
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-01 16:37 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW M2 CS (G87) - right rear view
Used in:
de:BMW M2, de:BMW G42
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-01 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mini Hatch (J01) John Cooper Works - left rear view
Used in:
de:John Cooper Works, de:Mini J01
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-06-01 18:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Parque da Fonte Luminosa (Lisbon)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-01 20:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Heliodoxa aurescens (Gould's jewelfront) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-01 20:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Crotophaga major (Greater ani)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-01 20:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Chlorophanes spiza caerulescens (Green honeycreeper) male
Reason:
No other images in ther parent category are of this ssp. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 1 June 2025 (UTC) -- Charlesjsharp (talk)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-06-02 04:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculptures Sur En, Sent. Ikarus - 2015. Artwork Team Von Burg / Traber.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-02 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Noah's Drunkenness by Antonio Zanchi - Musei Civici (Treviso) - Santa Caterina
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-02 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Oedemera podagrariae mating on Viburnum tinus
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-02 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Pikivets
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-02 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Pikivets

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-02 07:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Tangara schrankii schrankii (Green-and-gold tanager)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-02 07:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Opisthocomus hoazin (Hoatzin)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-02 07:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Opisthocomus hoazin (Hoatzin) head
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-02 10:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Double-spiral staircase of the Hospital military Scrive, (Lille), (Fr)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-02 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi A6 Avant C9 - left rear view
Used in:
de:Audi A6 C9
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-02 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi SQ5 Sportback GU - right front view
Used in:
de:Audi SQ5, de:Audi Q5 GU Sportback
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-02 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Dacia Bigster - left rear view
Used in:
de:Dacia Bigster
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2025-06-02 15:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Aua Sesvenna.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2025-06-02 16:23 (UTC)
Scope:
HMCS Frédérick Rolette (AOPV 434) – IMO 4702541 – under construction
Reason:
Best view of this Candian Arctic patrol ship while under construction at the Irving Shipyards in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. HMCS Frédérick Rolette (AOPV 434) is unusual being one of 6 Arctic offshore patrol vessels, Canada is currently building to maintain order and sovereignty in the Canadian Arctic. The design is based on the Norwegian NoCGV Svalbard and optimized for Canadian Arctic conditions. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Espandero (talk) on 2025-06-02 19:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de La Sarraz, view from the south
Reason:
Used and best in scope -- Espandero (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Espandero (talk) on 2025-06-02 19:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Besso, view from the north
Reason:
Best in scope and used -- Espandero (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Espandero (talk) on 2025-06-02 20:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Rochers de Naye, view from the north
Reason:
Used and best in scope -- Espandero (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-06-03 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Blooming Prunus serrulata 'Jo-nioi' in April in the gardens of Hortus Haren (Groningen).
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-03 05:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Page by Eugenio Moretti Larese - Museo civico Luigi Bailo - Treviso
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-03 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhagonycha fulva - mating on Viburnum tinus
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-03 07:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Posukhivka
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-03 07:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Memorial sign to victims of Holodomor in Posukhivka
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

hamster

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2011-12-10 22:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European Hamster)

 Support Excellent. All criteria met.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)  Support Seems to be the best one Kersti (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-01-04 16:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European hamster)
Reason:
replacing image of museum specimen -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Acridotheres ginginianus nests

[edit]
   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Moheen (keep talking) on 2025-04-27 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acridotheres ginginianus nests
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Moheen (keep talking) on 2025-04-27 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acridotheres ginginianus nests
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Au chat barré, ancien estaminet avenue du Peuple Belge (Lille)

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-24 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Old tavern Au chat barré avenue du Peuple Belge, Lille, view from Parc Louise de Bettignies
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Au chat barré, ancien estaminet avenue du Peuple Belge (Lille)
Reason:
Perspective is ok on this one. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2025 (UTC) -- Sebring12Hrs (talk)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Immeuble, 31 rue de Gand (Lille)

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-25 15:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Renaissance house, rue de Gand 31, Lille, view from rue des Tours
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 31 rue de Gand (Lille)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-27 16:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies, 61-63, rue de la Monnaie (Vieux-Lille), view from 28 Rue de la Monnaie
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies, Lille
Reason:
The left facade is visible from this view. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 06:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC) -- Sebring12Hrs (talk)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

bats

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-08-05 13:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhynchonycteris naso (Long-nosed proboscis bats)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-06 15:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhynchonycteris naso (Long-nosed proboscis bats)
Reason:
I use a better camera these days! -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=1008566955"