Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Threshold
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Windows Threshold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Supported only by rumor and speculation (violation of WP:CRYSTAL). Redirect to main Windows article undone by a single editor who contends it to be "useless" because this speculated release is not covered in the target and because the redirect was not discussed, and considered the reversion vandalism. ViperSnake151 Talk 18:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:RS. Existing sources make no secret of this being entirely speculations, with words such as "Rumoured", "may think we know", "mythical", etc. Paul Thurrott's Supersite is especially an unreliable as a primary source, although it is a worthy secondary source. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 10:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Northern Antarctica ₵ 22:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.