Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somesh

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was undecided so keep. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Somesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in this article indicates why there should be an article about this particular name out of the millions of given names in the world. It's not a disambiguation page with a list of people of the name, it's just a definition which at best should go to Wiktionary, but my tagging it as such was deleted twice, so there's no point in edit warring about it. Corvus cornix_talk 06:32, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

other articles also exists like this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohit . ss 06:42, 26 December 2010 (UTC) — • contribs) 06:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So let's delete Rohit too. —Tamfang (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Convert to disambiguation page, as is the case for other pages about given names. Cullen328 (talk) 07:20, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HOW ?????????? ss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someshvrm (talk • contribs) 07:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep (see my rewrite). Most articles about given names may be disambiguation pages, but they usually contain a few sentences about the name itself. This article contains a sentence about the origin of the name, and cannot be turned into a disambig page because there aren't any articles about someone with a given name of Somesh. -- Lear's Fool 11:07, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 11:08, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 11:08, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Delete all in the category Category:Indian_given_names--...Captain......Tälk tö me... 13:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Corvus cornix_talk 00:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - for heaven's sake, it's useful information, and appears adequately referenced. Opbeith (talk) 16:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Useful to whom? —Tamfang (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - useful for us; humans. who knows about the meaning of "Somesh" ss 07:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someshvrm (talk • contribs)
    - I'm a human and it's not useful to me. Please be more specific. —Tamfang (talk) 09:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.