Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Java

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Prior to release, consensus appeared to favor draftification of the article. However, since release, consensus appears to have shifted to keeping the article due to the inclusion of further sourcing. (non-admin closure) EggRoll97 ^(talk) 03:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Java

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased movie that does not satisfy film notability guidelines. Unreleased films are only notable if production satisfies general notability, and nothing is said about production. Since the film is unreleased, nothing is said about reception. Recommend draftification until film is released and reviewed. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The film is releasing in 10 days time. It has significant coverage in media, news and other sources(116.68.96.220 (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Draftify until the release as it might not meet WP:NFF: "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." Alternatively, delete can be appropriate if draftifying is not an option. Kolma8 (talk) 20:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 06:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: Agreed, draftify this article until after release and more reviews are available. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Article has notability and references from notable sources.
Anish Viswa 09:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Movie has released and received reviews from Malayala Manorama - https://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-reviews/2021/02/12/operation-java-malayalam-movie-review.html and The Times of India - https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movie-reviews/operation-java/movie-review/80882782.cms. There are other references from The Hindu - https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/operation-java-is-a-cyber-crime-thriller-says-director-tharun-moorthy/article33810750.ece and The New Indian Express - https://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/malayalam/2021/feb/03/watch--operation-javatrailer-promises-a-thrill-ride-2258690.html . Probably should stay now. Jupitus Smart 02:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the film has now been released and has received secondary coverage such as a full review in The Times of India and others so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be deleted as it shares so many information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.83.57.110 (talk) 11:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC) This is good. This should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.83.57.110 (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.