Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented software engineering

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Object-oriented programming. Sandstein 19:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Object-oriented software engineering

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contrary to what the title suggests, this article is not about a generic term, but about a specific methodology (and book of the same name). However, the only sourced content is about object-oriented programming in general. A web search turned up mostly pdfs of the book and a few blogs, but I could not find good sources. Thus, it seems to me that this fails verifiability and notability. PJvanMill)talk( 21:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. PJvanMill)talk( 21:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is written like a tutorial and is not WP:VERIFIABLE. 122.60.173.107 (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this is a puff piece about Jacobson's approach. The article attempts to inherit notability from the broad concept of object-oriented programming which has a similar title. It's basically coatracking off another article and has demonstrated no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to suggest notability. Searches for such coverage turn up very little when restricted to Jacobson's approach. It perhaps merits a line in the aforementioned similarly titled article. SITH (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this is deleted, this title could be redirected to object-oriented programming as a related term. Natg 19 (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete then add a redirect to Object-oriented programming which is what the first source is about anyway, just puff for Jacobson and his book. KylieTastic (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.