Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Location Method
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Language Location Method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The citations in the article are both very general and were published before the article says this method was created. I couldn't find any reliable sources online either under "Language Location Method" or under "Sprachpositions-Methode" (its German name). Fails WP:GNG. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 21:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
For more information on Language Location Method please search/visit www.biglittleoaks.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles Bloaks (talk • contribs) 08:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete advertorial. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- It looks like WP:OR and it quacks like link spam for the site Charles Bloaks references above, though I'll stop short of calling article content a WP:DUCK. Instead, I'll note that I found no scholarly articles mentioning the method and say delete for failing GNG. Cnilep (talk) 02:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.