Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italian keyboard layout
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of QWERTY keyboard language variants#Italian. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Italian keyboard layout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested redirect several times without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to show independent notability. And currently not enough sourcing to pass WP:VERIFY. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 17:04, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:14, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Why is this less notable than Romanian keyboard layout, Icelandic keyboard layout, Icelandic keyboard layout, etc.? In your view, should all of these be merged into List of QWERTY keyboard language variants? Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- I have not looked at the other ones in depth, but please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If they are as poorly sourced as this one, then yes, as an ATD, redirecting to the variant page would be preferable. Onel5969 TT me 01:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I know about WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, I was asking for your opinion. Thanks! Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I have not looked at the other ones in depth, but please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If they are as poorly sourced as this one, then yes, as an ATD, redirecting to the variant page would be preferable. Onel5969 TT me 01:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect: to List of QWERTY keyboard language variants. Merge is unneeded as this entire page is already present in that list. In my searching reliable sourcing was thin, mostly blogs and reddit talking about it. Perhaps there is more in Italian, as always I will reconsider if presented with non-English sources. Moritoriko (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- The entirety of the Icelandic keyboard layout article is also already at the list article so it could probably be redirected as well. Its only source is a primary source defining it. Moritoriko (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Merge andRedirect to qwerty variants, it barely even looks that different. EDIT: Looks like it’s a fork of whats on that list, so it doesnt even need a merge. Metallurgist (talk) 01:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)- Keep. Original author here. In my opinion List of QWERTY keyboard language variants is too large and may be difficult to navigate, this is why I created this page to add the new info. Neq00 (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Side comment: it’s not only about the Italian layout. I think that most of the info in that page should be moved to language-specific pages, leaving only basic info about the layouts and See also links. Neq00 (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect: to List of QWERTY keyboard language variants I think redirecting makes the most sense here and this page seems to be the ideal place for the information from this article to live. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 20:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.