Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Publishing System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Integrated Publishing System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lack of notability and reliable external sources Gdarin (talk) 13:48, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, writing about the editor-in-chief of the Encyclopedia Britannica (McHenry) or questioning the credibility of his account, published on the professionally maintained website of the general counsel of the Encyclopedia's publisher, is truly bizarre. Will we also consider IBM's software lists unreliable? Will we consider the information about several over 400-page manuals for this system, or the exorbitant prices for this software, to be fabricated? --Wiklol (talk) 01:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society per above. Being a product of a notable company also doesn't make something notable. Notability is not inherited. CabinetCavers (talk) 17:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]