Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intec Telecom Systems

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 19:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intec Telecom Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find evidence for notability of Intec. A Before shows routine coverage of acquisitions, and itself being acquired, but nothing that adds up to N:ORG. Borderline G11, but it has a long history and could be stubbed back if there were anything on which to write an article. Star Mississippi 13:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, Companies, and United Kingdom. Star Mississippi 13:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Specialised vendor, no evidence of notability, FTSE SmallCap doesn't get us over the line. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough independent reliable sources to pass WP:NCORP --Bash7oven (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect: An article rather frozen in time at 2010 when this company was acquired by CSG International. The article content is an unreferenced list of clients (from whom notability is not inherited) and a list of previous acquisition announcements, which are trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Aside from a brief case study I am not finding coverage; fails WP:NCORP. It has a line entry at CSG_International#Acquisitions, so a redirect could be an WP:ATD, though Intec appears to have left no trace at CSG's website. AllyD (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.