Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Loop with iVillage

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) f e minist 04:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the Loop with iVillage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor television series; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Only coverage are mere mentions or press release summaries/cancelation notices, not significant coverage. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to iVillage#Television show Aired for two years nationally on a limited number of stations; a failure that pretty much did in iVillage, but it was so generic it might as well be titled Orlando Set Talk Show. Limited content here will be moved to that section in the iVillage article. Nate • (chatter) 18:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep this seems to be a television show with WP:RS.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The only sources I can find are press releases and postings from the show itself (not independent of subject, obviously) and cancelation notices. Those aren't sufficient to meet GNG. If you have found significant coverage, please share thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 08:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.