Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Few Model Management

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Few Model Management

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page looks entirely like advertising copy and I am not convinced that it has a serious prospect of meeting the notability requirements for inclusion. I cannot rescue it via a copy-edit; I suggest it is removed. Perry Pat Etic Poleaxe (talk) 14:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the article passes WP:GNG, but may need to be better worded, edits and improvements have already been done by several editors and I think it's best to allow corrections to continue.Onyeuwaoma2000 (talk) 03:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. Fails GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:57, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This discussion page was created without the {{afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own on the nomination at this time. @Perry Pat Etic Poleaxe: If you with to nominate other articles for deletion in the future, please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 00:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per rationale provided by @HighKing: & furthermore The article is a promotional piece that discusses a non notable organization that fails WP:NCORP. Probably the work of an editor who may have a financial stake in creating this article. Celestina007 (talk) 17:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.