Talk:System on module

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

Merge this entry with computer-on-module

The terms "system-on-module" and "computer-on-module" can be seen as synonyms. The two separate entries could be merged into one main entry (I suggest computer-on-module), and "system-on-module" could refer to this entry. --TecCougar (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge completed on February 3, 2009 --TecCougar (talk) 13:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I support merging. I see that after TecCougar merged system on module into computer-on-module, someone re-created a "system on module" article and someone else (?) in a later edit changed the computer-on-module article so instead of saying COM and SOM are synonyms, it now says COM is "very similar to" a SOM -- but without any explanation of the difference (if any). I'm in favor of re-merging these two articles, since as far as I can tell the difference (if any) between COM and SOM can be explained in a few short sentences in the merged article. --DavidCary (talk) 20:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I'd need to do some research to confirm but I believe SOM is most commonly used to represent a subsystem on a module. COM is a full computer system on a module. These are not synonyms nor is SOM a superset of COM. TecCougar's justification for merge doesn't hold water. DavidCary may be right about a couple of sentences but they would be potentially confusing sentences and if there's no valid motivation to merge, there's no need. ~Kvng (talk) 14:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead image

Graperain Technology product line provides benefit of Price, Performance, Package and Power making it an ideal solutions for robotics, infotainment, automation and control — and Internet of things (IoT) devices, including wearable technology.

G8916 CPU module is from Graperain Technology for Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 ARM Cortex-A53 quad core 1.2GHz processor, with on-board 1GB DDR3 + 8GB eMMC and friendly 4G cellular support.

@Jamesm7: can you please explain here your preference for the two block diagrams as lead image over this picture. I am having trouble interpreting your edit comments where you've changed this. ~Kvng (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are several picture that are company advertisements - a reference article should be kept generic as possible A block diagram give everyone a example to build their own System On Module if you need to advertise Graperain Technology do in on their site like TI — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesm7 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamesm7: I don't see how the original image (to the right here) is a company advertisement. Maybe the caption is. We can change the caption. A block diagram is not a module. I think it better to have a picture of an actual module than an abstract block diagram. ~Kvng (talk) 20:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Human Body Analogy

I think the human body analogy in the introduction is not at all useful. An analogy is only useful if it adds meaning to the topic. I can't see how comparing a SOM to the human digestive system and nervous system illustrates any aspect of the topic. The term SOM needs to be defined a bit more clearly by indicating what is included in the term and what is not. I would do that myself, but I came here looking for clarification on how a SOM is different from just saying computer board. I still don't know.

Gnuarm (talk) 05:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SOM vs SoM

SOM was changed to SoM in Dec 2022. Was there a reason? Korishou (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both forms are used by engineers. Either is fine but we should be consistent within an article. I assume the changes were to improve consistency. ~Kvng (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]