Jump to content

Talk:Successive-approximation ADC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Charge scaling DAC image added Whiteflye 15:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charge scaling DAC image requested Whiteflye 17:11, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading

One switch is missing in pic (comparator neg input to GND), and step 1 is pointless. And would be better to have the example without offset to simplify the example then mention offset separately after. And for same reason have example with 4 or 5 caps, not "N". See here for good description: http://www.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/an/slyt176/slyt176.pdf

Meaning of R

What does the character R means, when talking about SAR? "register"? 87.161.135.182 (talk) 17:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's already defined for you in the caption and first occurrence in the body. ~Kvng (talk) 02:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the animation for a "9-bit" not a "10-bit" SAR

Example 1 starts with "The ten steps to converting an analog input to 10 bit digital" and uses this animation: [[:File:ADC animation 20.gif|Successive approximation animation]]

But isn't that really just a 9-bit conversion. I know that the x-axis is labeled with notches starting at 1 and ending at 10, but there are only *9* steps between those notches. (Going from 1 to 2 is the 1st step, and going from 9 to 10 is the 9th step). And I know in the top-right corner there are 10 bits, but the right-most bit is always 1 and doesn't seem to be contributing to the conversion in this animation. Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 19:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Example 2 later treats that initial state as "Initial" step, and considers the first branch to be the "First" step:
So it seems that GIF might be better redone with the first number in the x-axis being labeled as "initial" or "0" and then have every number subtracted by 1, so it is more clear that is really just 9-bit conversion. Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]