Jump to content

Talk:Integrated injection logic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

I believe "Integrated" is wrong, Should be "Current Injection Logic" - referring to current by the symbol, "i"

Why Obsolete

If its so good, why is it now obsolete? Tabby (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This asked and answered here:

CMOS uses less power http://groups.google.com.au/g/2687fefa/t/e0107f36dbdf3bba/d/d61d7d0efb297647?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=happened+i2l#d61d7d0efb297647

I2L was slower and didn't scale up well because the output of the gate needed a separate collector for each input it connected to. https://groups.google.com/group/alt.folklore.computers/browse_thread/thread/353e483bc5f7bb9e/73d0c4361faed77?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=happened+i2l#073d0c4361faed77

60.241.12.136 (talk) 11:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Integrated_injection_logic&oldid=1201492271"