Jump to content

Talk:Dynamic torque sensor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Reviewer 2

Simple article and easy to read. Is a good overview of the topic, maybe it can be expanded adding images and some more informations regarding the working principles. Loscimmio (talk) 13:53, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. I added more pictures for better understanding Hassaan72 (talk) 14:16, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer 1

Nice overview of the work.
I would add the following things (but keep in mind that they are more of a preference of mine than an actual suggested change):
- In the working principles section maybe some images explaining visually what strain gauge, magnetoelastic, optical and piezoelectric effects are.
- A table comparing dynamic and torque sensors would be beneficial for an instant visual comparison.
- Some mathematical formulae may be of help to understand where rotary torque, non-contact torque and reaction torque sensors practically reveal the electrical change.

A part from this preference of mine, I enjoyed reading it! TomMarine (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review and valuable suggestions. I will update the article accordingly. Hassaan72 (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer 3

Nice overview of dynamic torque sensor. Added a few links to other wikipedia pages and minor corrections. Although the text flows, I have mixed feelings about the use of very short paragraphs.

Something that I would improve:

  • The introduction to the working principle is the repetition of a sentence in the initial part of the article.
  • A few formulas may be useful to better understand the working principles
  • I would add images to better understand the various types of sensors
  • "Technical specifications and performance criteria" does not seem properly formatted in terms of references.

FjordJarl9 (talk) 14:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review and valuable suggestions. I will add the mentioned things in article. Hassaan72 (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]