The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
The picture shows that the First-Order Bickley-Naylor function is symmetric about 0. However, upon inspection, any value of x < 0 produces Infinity because at pi/2, cos(theta) goes to 0. This results in exp[abs(x)/0] at the end of the integration range. Thus, I think the picture should be modified to properly show that the function is only defined in a useful way for values of x >= 0. 76.129.215.146 (talk) 14:10, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Possible typo: Naylor/Nayler
Some references on these functions spell John Nayler's name with an 'e'.
For example, the article here [1].
.jpg?lang=en){kind=small}
