Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM Spectrum Control

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IBM Spectrum Control

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There are no independent sources Jcarlosmartins (talk) 15:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable, should be deleted. There are no independent sources, and the article is more like a product description from an IBM brochure than an encyclopedia article.PopePompus (talk) 07:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:10, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am not familiar with this product as I was with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM Tivoli Storage Manager, that aside all the google book hits I found are primary, and did not find significant non primary mentions of the product elsewhere. Jeepday (talk) 19:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Again (as the 2 other AfDs on IBM products nominated on this date) notable to be sure in its field, and a very possible search term for WP readers - this product should have an encyclopedia article here.--Concertmusic (talk) 00:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Concertmusic You may or may not be correct about this. But your argument will hold more weight if you can find references that support it meeting WP:GNG, adding those references to the article and making a note here that you did so, will go a long way to supporting your position. Jeepday (talk) 18:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or redirect to an appropriate page as a second choice. The article cites no notability sources (reliable independent secondary sources with substantial coverage), and a BEFORE search revealed no such sources either. Although many Google Books results came up, all of the ones I could find are primary (published by IBM itself), which disqualifies them from being notability sources. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.