Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MB&F

MB&F

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of the worst cases of advertisement I have ever seen. Lots of corporate fluff and absolutely zero sources (but plenty of external links to company press releases). Fails WP:GNG (plenty of churnalism out there) and needs to be nuked from high orbit. -Indy beetle (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per TNT. (t · c) buidhe 08:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have reverted to an older version which is not as much of a blatant ad. Now it's pretty much just a catalogue (but not a well sourced one). The company has received at least some coverage in major media, such as this long piece in the NYTimes. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- That NYT article is about the founder, who already has an article here. -Indy beetle (talk) 12:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Maximilian Büsser#MB&F (2005 - present) - The source Þjarkur has shown us is interesting, but doesn't seem like enough to me. However, I think redirecting to the founder is better than deletion. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads more like a catalog list of items for sale, not establishing notability Oaktree b (talk) 02:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Conditioned weak keep conditioned on keeping my latest changes to the article, where I removed some images and unsourced sections. The keep is weak because the interesting sources [1] [2] [3] do not seem to solidly establish notability of the company per NCORP. Mathias (talk) 05:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]