Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii Linux Project
A non-notable, incomplete project. Simply enough, something that may never be done and has little individual value. Possibly on the Wii and/or Linux pages. Scepia 21:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:SOFTWARE -- Selmo (talk) 21:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - I disagree. It seems like a group of people feel the need to put Linux on every platform they possibly can, and there's plenty trying to get it on the Wii — here's a list of nine different sites up for Linux hacks especially (ten, if you include the site linked to). It's in development still, but it almost certainly will be done, and there's Wikipedia articles on software/hardware in development. Be more specific about what it fails in WP:SOFTWARE. Whether there should be a separate page on every variation of Linux, according to system... now, that's a different question. 66.69.90.253 22:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Y'know, you could find 1,000 sites on a given topic, but it doesn't mean it belongs on WP. 9 or 10 is pretty pathetic, what should we write an article about milk and cookies and the scientific interactions they create? Scepia 00:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 22:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Notable, cited. What more could you want? Also, could you please source the policy that says that something planned for (and proven to be in via citing, as to not be crystalballing) development is not for the wiki? -Ryanbomber 12:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- As simple as WP:Notability. Every little project can't be mentioned. Scepia 00:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Ryanbomber, article's sources demonstrate notability. hateless 22:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- A post from /. and Ars doesn't grant Wikipedia rights. You could find a great number, truly a huge number of products that don't have a WP page. Scepia 00:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, how is this any different from Xbox Linux? In fact, looking through Category:Linux distributions, I see many distributions that are much less notable than this one. JACOPLANE • 2007-01-3 02:50
- Comment: WP:INN --Pak21 17:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: coverage in ArsTech and Slashdot meets the "subject of multiple non-trivial published works" criterion of WP:SOFTWARE --Pak21 17:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)