User talk:PythonSwarm/Archive

GA review of Network synthesis

Thanks very much for reviewing Network synthesis for GA. I'm not sure what you were referring to by a previous edit war. The only thing I could find was I reverted an attempted change to the citation style. Reversions are just part of normal editing. If it doesn't go beyond WP:BRD it's definitely not an edit war. It might be a dispute, but that's not the same as edit warring, and in this case the revert was not even challenged or discussed. Was that it, or were you thinking of something else? SpinningSpark 10:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think of that changing the citation style. -- PythonSwarm ^{Talk | Contribs | Global} 13:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to chime in about the review at Talk:Network synthesis/GA1 as it was brought up at WT:GAN. The review wasn't of the highest quality with the nominator Thepenguin9 suggesting that another review be carried out. GAN reviews are usually reasonably in-depth. I actually think the article is in pretty good shape with a few issues to be addressed. Might I suggest you talk with Thepenguin9 and come to a solution/expand on the review? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I see from your talk page history this has been brought up before, but you need to stop providing unsolicited advice to new users when you, yourself, are new and unfamiliar with our policies. This is not helpful; there is no reason why this editor needs to change their username despite the filter log and a filter log trigger is not going to have any effect on someone becoming an admin, not that an editor with one single edit is even concerned with such things. Please stop trying to do admin-type duties, clerking admin areas, advising new editors on policy, and concentrate on improving content until you have a better grasp on our policies. At some point we admins may grow weary of asking and will enforce such a change. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback and Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer) for a period of 3 months for persistent unhelpful comments on RFP pages.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 07:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just 5 days ago you had a close brush with a partial block because of unhelpful comments on user requests at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback. I messed up the block, and you retracted your post, so I let it lie as you seemed to get the message. Yet here you are four days later making redundant comments on Ana Catarine's request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer. If you can't stop yourself, then it'll have to be done for you. Cabayi (talk) 07:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]