Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnn (file manager)

Nnn (file manager)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources in article are entirely primary. Searches turn up no published, significant coverage of subject. List of articles at the end of the software's Github readme are either blog posts or software catalog descriptions. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 22:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 22:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that there are now about six good review-style article links, so I think notability is pretty clear. - Snori (talk) 00:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - Article references seems to have improved markedly since the AfD, and it's quite clear that it's a widely known piece of software in it's niche. - Snori (talk) 02:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems to have some independant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not enough that there are more independent references. Sources must cover the topic in a significant way. The new "sources" that have been added are the literal readme from the repo, and a few listicles from Linux websites that have passing mentions to the software. Wikipiedia is not supposed to be a comprehensive collection of all software tools in the world. If this software becomes notable, it'll get an article eventually. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 21:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]