Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dylan Hendricks (talk | contribs) at 20:31, 1 June 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


May 26

04:57:31, 26 May 2020 review of submission by Margaret Chung


Margaret Chung (talk) 04:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


04:57:31, 26 May 2020 review of submission by Margaret Chung



06:07:56, 26 May 2020 review of submission by Editorlanpao


Editorlanpao (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editorlanpao You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further as there is little to no chance it can be improved to meet Wikipedia standards. It does not appear that the person meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable director, and no amount of editing can change that. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:03:09, 26 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Vishak Vijayan 05


It was just an information post. Was just trying to educate the users about the software.

Vishak Vijayan 05 (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vishak Vijayan 05 Wikipedia is not for merely providing information, that is considered promotional on Wikipedia. Wikipedia articles summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about article subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Please review Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:32:41, 26 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Sachi1307



Sachi1307 (talk) 09:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:43:08, 26 May 2020 review of draft by Saadstockholm


Hello, I dont understand why this subject was declined? What criteria's does not this journalist meet? Can you please describe the issue here and what I need to do?

Saadstockholm (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are all written by him, Wikipedia requires independent sources written by people unconnected to him. Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:22:54, 26 May 2020 review of draft by TheBirdsShedTears

Please review this draft. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears: This is not going to happen. We dont operate on deadlines. You submitted your draft today There are 2,869 other submissions awaiting review, most of which are waiting longer. Please be patient. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:47, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:35:21, 26 May 2020 review of submission by Trashfan


Lionel Baldenweg is a member of the composer trio Diego Baldenweg with Nora Baldenweg & Lionel Baldenweg. This individual page was mainly created for the purpose of finding Lionel Baldenweg in his categories (australian film score composers, male film score composers etc.). Thank you for helping to finalise this article in any way. Trashfan (talk) 11:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trashfan (talk) 11:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trashfan. The correct way to achieve the desired effect is not a new article, but a redirect from Lionel Vincent Baldenweg to the trio. The redirect may then be categorized as described in WP:INCOMPATIBLE. I've done this for you. He now appears in the "B" section of Category:Australian male composers, for example. You may do the same for the other members of the trio. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:45:44, 26 May 2020 review of submission by Ramzy Arbid


Ramzy Arbid (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


11:45:44, 26 May 2020 review of submission by Ramzy Arbid


14:08, 26 May 2020 Yunshui talk contribs blocked Ramzy Arbid talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) ({{OversightBlock}}) Nothing left to see here. @Ramzy Arbid: you might want to read Wikipedia:Advice for younger editors. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:16:56, 26 May 2020 review of submission by Mickane


Hey, thanks for the help. Today, i just had my first article published. The problem is when i google search for the person from the article, or google search the person with wiki after their name, nothing shows.

The only way i can navigate to the wikipedia page is access the wikipedia website and do a manual search.

I have read it might be something to do with indexing and an article had to be patrolled before indexing is allowed, it's all so confusing. Ive idea what it means.

Could someone kindly tell me how i would get the article made about an athlete, show up on when i did a google search of the person?

Please and Thanks

Michael Kane (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Kane (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked the article as reviewed, so when Google next crawls the page it will appear in the search. As you have a declared conflict of interest any future editing should be restricted to suggestions made on the articles talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 19:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:43:19, 26 May 2020 review of submission by 2605:E000:1529:8653:6DAF:9E4D:DF3A:B2AC

I respectfully request that you reconsider your decision as the subject deemed not important enough is referred to on other Wikipedia pages, inlcuding this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venice,_Los_Angeles#Historic_post_office.

2605:E000:1529:8653:6DAF:9E4D:DF3A:B2AC (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A passing mention in another Wikipedia article, confers no notability whatsoever. Theroadislong (talk) 21:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 27

00:01:10, 27 May 2020 review of draft by Mtrayyubi


Mtrayyubi (talk)

01:25:06, 27 May 2020 review of submission by Bmantha


We received a message from reviewer --' Your submission at Articles for creation: Biodiversity Park, Visakhapatnam has been accepted. But this is not seen in the general search wikipage . When this article gets visible in search ..Bmantha Bmantha (talk) 01:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bmantha. I'm not sure what you mean by "the general search wikipage". Biodiversity Park, Visakhapatnam is visible from https://www.wikipedia.org/, which is the most general Wikipedia search page. Perhaps you mean external search engines such as Google, Bing, Yandex, etc. When the article is patrolled (the timing of which you have no control over) it will be released for indexing by search engines. Whether and when search engines actually index it is beyond the control of Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:51:13, 27 May 2020 review of submission by Mtrayyubi


Mtrayyubi (talk) 06:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


08:14:39, 27 May 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA


SONGEZO SA (talk) 08:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SONGEZO SA As suggested already, you need to show how the subject meets the criteria of WP:NMUSIC.Theroadislong (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:08:38, 27 May 2020 review of submission by Molee4real


Molee4real (talk) 12:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC) Please I have correct some errors in the article so I would like someone to review it and help me to re arrange it please.[reply]

@Molee4real: To reiterate my reply of 13 May, the big "STOP" sign on Draft:Counsellorsalah is to signal that you should stop pushing the topic. No amount of editing can make the subject acceptable. You are free to edit a different article, but this draft will not be reviewed again, so stop asking. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:32:07, 27 May 2020 review of draft by EnricoFlx


Hello everyone,

Thank you in advance for the feedback on the draft. From now on, I'll handle the draft on J. Howaldt. I noticed that the criticism mentioned above (secondary sources about the subject) is missing on other Wikipedia articles as well, even from comparable persons (other sociologists or economists). Especially among scientists, their relevance and position in the scientific community is determined by the quality and number of scientific publications that are presented in this draft. I would be pleased if the article in its current form meets the requirements for Wikipedia. Otherwise I am happy about any kind of help and will develop a new draft.

stay healthy!


EnricoFlx (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EnricoFlx: Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Many articles were created before we began the ridiculous AfC process. Howewer, with 6,988,170 total articles, its impossible to monitor them all constantely. We can only act on things we know about. If you find other pages you think are equally inappopiate, please mention them so we can take action. As for your draft:
So we are left of with no references that qualify for establishing notability. Please read Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EnricoFlx (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Victor Schmidt: Thank you for your detailed answer. I will try to meet the requirements. User:EnricoFlx (talk) 9:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

18:54:21, 27 May 2020 review of submission by Tom in Vastervik


Dear sir , please help I'm new on Wikipedia and i made a atempt to get an article about my car published in/on Wikipedia, but it was not accepted , due to missing reliable sources (RS) . But as I discribed below is the car so unik and not known to the general publik that RS can not been found within Wikipedia or other sources.

Quoting previous dialog with one of your editors:

Lenham-Hurst GTR Dear sir, thanks for the promt reply regarding my article about my car, I understad that you was requesting (RS) reliable sources ( fully understandable ) . #1 Concerning technical data on the car , I presume present owner (my self) and registration certificate would be considered as RS.

2 Regarding history and the story about this unik car, would I ref. A, an article in https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/archive/article/june-1996/54/no-lemon-lenham where my car was described B When I made investigation about the background of my car I was able to locate a fellow who actually worked on the Lenham factory when my car was manufactured !His name is Mr Allan Hebb and his mail are (redacted) . He been very helfull to me, and can sure confirm my statements. Best regards Tom Karlsson Vastervik Sweden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom in Vastervik (talk • contribs) 17:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Tom in Vastervik, first point: NEVER share personal information about others (like emails). Such things are strictly prohibited. Second point: your car isn't notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia since your car isn't mentioned in reliable sources independent of the subject. JavaHurricane 03:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC) Dear Sir, so sorry abt my mistake , did not understand how "public" this chat was in fact, I'm new on Wikipedia and not that familiar with the language. Please note that this car is a part of British sportcar history, it's only builded in one example and not known to the public, it bin hidden away for more than 40 years, and now has my renovation of the car created curiosity in the motorworld , several magazine has asked to make reportage , and linked to this Wikipedia could be very helpful to get the fact's right. I personally love to check Wikipedia for fact's about odd items. So my humble question to you to reconsider your decision not to public an atricle in Wicipedia. Best Regards Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom in Vastervik (talk • contribs) 10:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

So what is next step, please advise me Best regards Tom Karlsson Vastervik Sweden

Tom in Vastervik (talk) 18:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tom in Vastervik: Wikipedia may not be used that way. One of its fundamental pillars is that the information in the encyclopedia must have been published in reliable sources first, before it can be included here. Never the other way around. After several reputable magazines report on the car, then an article about it may be created here. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:08:49, 27 May 2020 review of submission by 2604:3D09:AC82:AB00:AD7A:FB77:8117:EF7B

me 2604:3D09:AC82:AB00:AD7A:FB77:8117:EF7B (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:49:23, 27 May 2020 review of submission by 72.160.148.206


72.160.148.206 (talk) 23:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


23:50:19, 27 May 2020 review of submission by Nashvillelotus


Nashvillelotus (talk) 23:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The author changed the infobox after the draft was rejected, and one of the reasons for the rejection was that the infobox was a hoax because it identified the subject as a member of the United States House of Representatives, which would have political notability. As mayor of a city of 65,000, the subject does not have political notability, and the draft does not satisfy general notability. Putting false information in infoboxes is not a good idea. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 28

03:32:09, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Khetarpals.a


Khetarpals.a (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


i dont understand why is it said that I have violated the copyright. The article published on soolegal is written by me only, and I published the article there also. So how does this violate any copyright.

@Khetarpals.a: If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy, you can license that text so that it can be republished elsewhere. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Even if you are able to establish a compatible license, it likely will be impossible to use the text here. Material on that website has been written to encourage the hiring of an immigration attorney, a purpose which is fundamentally incompatible with Wikipedia. Writing an encyclopedia article is an entirely different undertaking. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05:10:10, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Terminalbud


I am requesting a re-review of this article because the reasons given for it being declined feels both vague and simply untrue. First of all it states I did not add sources after the second review, which i did and even made sure to write in the details of in the editing log. Second of all, it says it sounds like a biography, i have just followed the way other biographies have been written on Wikipedia, but i personally don't know miss Iversen, so if the reviewer is indicating that I am not reliable enough to write this article because i don't actually know her then fair enough, but i was under the impression that anyone can write articles about someone as long as the sources of information is legit. and everything i have found for this article is directly translated from online articles and magazines i have found and they are all added linked in the source section. Terminalbud (talk) 05:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Terminalbud: Between the second review on 5 March and the reject on 9 May, you made two edits to the draft. Those edits did not add any sources. What you say above is simply untrue.
The problems identified in the first two reviews have not been fixed. The first section, for example, cites IMDB and an article in Halden Arbeiderblad. IMDb, being user-generated, is not a reliable source. The Halden Arbeiderblad article supports only that she graduated from NISS in 2011-2012, which is a small part of the section. If you aren't being employed by Iversen to write this, then reviewers will wonder where you got information like: "Iversen grew up on the countryside of Norway before she moved to the City Trondheim where she studied ... from 2007 to 2009. This is also where she started her hosting career as a main host for the weekly show, created for and by students, Student Magasinet."
Six of the inline citations are split between Halden Arbeiderblad and Kampanje [no]. Possibly they could form the foundation of a draft. But the remaining citations do nothing to establish notability. Seven are to TV2 and NRK Radio, which are her employers, so not independent (they have a vested interest in promoting her). VGTV is an interview without analysis by the interviewer, it's Iversen in Iversen's words, so not independent. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:07:59, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88


70.59.84.88 (talk) 07:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:08:54, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Abhinavsidharth

Can I know which of the citations are reliable and which of them I should take off? Also, how many more reliable citations do I need? Abhinavsidharth (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abhinavsidharth. None of the citations are to independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of the company; all of them should be removed. The draft doesn't need a greater quantity of citations. The topic would need higher quality citations to demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in the encyclopedia). The reviewer's analysis is that no good sources exist, so no amount of editing will make the draft acceptable, and volunteers do not intend to review it again. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:37:47, 28 May 2020 review of submission by LuckyAnimations

Because It is my favorite movie and there is no info about it, anywhere. You ca only see it in the cinemas. LuckyAnimations (talk) 09:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LuckyAnimations: If there's no info about it, then it's not notable. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:34:13, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 2A02:587:DC14:8500:3D09:D167:1416:1B90

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Hey I want to know why want to delete the Vasileios Diagoumas article? If you search on the internet you will see many articles of that person, please answer me so I can know what you think

The page hasn't been deleted yet. The submission was declined because the submission didn't indicate how the subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Note that many Youtubers dont meet them. You can read Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:15:13, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Dbloom81

Hi, I was looking for some help. My article got rejected with the comment that Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION or WP:ADVERTISEMENT - I crafted my page around this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_Beach. The company this linked article is about is also a law firm, and I structured it in a very similar way. I was wondering what that article does differently versus what I did, and what I have to change to get my article accepted. All help in this regard would be greatly appreaciated! Dbloom81 (talk) 14:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dbloom81, The Harris Beach article was an unfortunate choice of model -- it is tagged as being promotional, and its notability has been challenged. it may be significantly rewritten or even deleted in the near future.
The key issue here is notability (a term which Wikipedia uses in a special sence. See our guideline o9n the notability of companies and WP:CORPDEPTH. In general an article should demonstrate the notability of the topic by including citations to multiple independent published reliable sources that each discuss the topic in some depth and detail. In the current draft:
  • ref 1 is to the firms o0wn web site -- not independent.
  • Ref 2 is to bestlawfirms, which ranks firms but gives no details -- no significant coverage.
  • Ref 3 is to a Rochester Business Journal article behind a paywall, so I cannot evaluate it. But it would be only one source at best.
  • Ref 4 is to a list of articvles written by (not about) a firm member in the NY Daily Record -- not independent, and no significant coverage of the firm.
  • Ref 5 is the same as ref 4, for a different member of the firm
In short, none of these (except possibly the Rochester Business Journal article, has anything to demonstrate the notability oif this firm. News coverage or other independent writing about (no9t by) the firm would be needed. Not blogs, not passing mentions or directory entries, and not anything based on PR from the firm.
The secondary issue here is promotion. The lists (with no detail) of areas of practice and office locations do not add much to the encyclopedic value of teh text, and do have a flavo9r of promotion. The areas of practice in particular should probably go, unless there are noted achievements in some of them that are discussed by indentation sources in some detail. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:24:11, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 27.4.7.178


27.4.7.178 (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC) {{SAFESUBST:Void|}just give me few more changes to make please to all administrators. Let me Put all relevant sources once again please . And do help me with it requesting all[reply]

14:27:29, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Swasti Salecha

Because I am not given any particular reason as to why my article is rejected. Please explain me and share the details since I am doing all this for the first time. Swasti Salecha (talk) 14:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was rejected because it is a blatant advertisement sourced to their own website. Theroadislong (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See further the answer I gave at the Teahouse. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:42, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:31:42, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Tauqir baig


Tauqir baig (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tauqir baig: This isn't even close to being an article. Please note that Wikipedia is not a social network. You can read WP:YFA for information about writing your first article. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:15:20, 28 May 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA


SONGEZO SA (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:43:02, 28 May 2020 review of draft by RoyBuchanan


Hello! I am trying to create a basic Wiki page for the 112 Drive-In movie theater in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Doing so would start the process of beginning to link to it on other Wiki pages that list remaining drive-in theaters in America (there are only about 330 left in the country), so it can be easily found by people seeking such information. My submission was rejected, and I was told, "The sources you currently have don't demonstrate any particular importance." However, I feel as though the establishment itself — which is the oldest remaining drive-in in the state, and one of only three left in the entire state — demonstrates particular importance in and of itself, due to its rarity, and that needing to provide such a description from a source, which I am unable to find via Google Books, local/state media, etc., will keep me from creating the page.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

RoyBuchanan (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RoyBuchanan: first of all, your draft was declined, not rejected. I am going to ping the reviewer, @Sam-2727: as I am not that comfortable with special notability stuff like here. Howewer, for the sources of your draft:
  • #1 appears to be a directory listing, I am unsure if its reliable but most are not
  • #2 could be useable
  • #3 is a book I wasn't able to check right now, but it could be. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    RoyBuchanan all of what Victor Schmidt says is correct. #3 I would doesn't indicate notability because it's a list of drive in theaters in the United States. Surely not every drive in theater is notable or deserves a Wikipedia article! If it is indeed a "rarity" then there are likely news articles that discuss it in the depth. Looking up "112 drive-in" (with quotes) on google finds plenty of sources. Just add these sources and you should be good to go. An interesting direction you could take here is mentioning the drive-in theater during COVID-19. It seems that there are a lot of news articles online that discuss that. Sam-2727 (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    You can of course submit your article again once you add these sources. Sam-2727 (talk) 17:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:19:51, 28 May 2020 review of draft by S.elrefaie


S.elrefaie (talk) 16:19, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@S.elrefaie: your draft currently does not establish how this subject meets WP:NMUSIC. You have a single non-independent source linked. We require at least three reliable, independent sources. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:24:25, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 2601:646:4201:AE40:75D7:9382:98A7:2403


2601:646:4201:AE40:75D7:9382:98A7:2403 (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The topic is notable enough, as it is searchable on all streaming platforms, and you can find It on many social media sites. There is also already a Google knowledge panel on the topic.

Social media networks are not eigible for establishing notability. Please read WP:42 for what wikipedia looks for. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:45:54, 28 May 2020 review of submission by BristolAlex

Hello, my submission of this draft was declined. It said it's not "qualified" and doesn't meet the formal tone. The draft is a 1:1-translation from the German article about the same person, which was approved and is online for quite a while now. I know that the two Wikipedias are different things, nevertheless I don't have a clue what to improve. IMO it is written in a formal, neutral tone and every detail has got a reference to it. Thank you very much for your help.

BristolAlex (talk) 17:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BristolAlex Non neutral content includes "the saxophonist with the famous german musician", "participated on the highly successful albums", "at the renowned", "taking place in the sold-out „Stadthalle Sigmaringen", " multifaceted and versatile". Theroadislong (talk) 18:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:16:57, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Coder196


The page has been substantially revised to meet Wikipedia's rules. Please re-review and provide advice. Thank you! Coder196 (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


19:27:17, 28 May 2020 review of submission by মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার


মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uমোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার Draft6:Nurunnahar does not cite any independent sources There is nothing in it to indicate that the subject is notable. In particular it does not indicate that this person comes close to meeting the criteria in our guideline on notability for actors or our general notability guideline. Most professional actors are not notable, and will not have Wikipedia articles. Unless there are multiple, professionally published reliable sources that each discuss Nurunnahar in depth and that are independent of him, or unless he fulfills one of the other criteria of WP:NACTOR (which does not seem to be the case) he is not notable at this time, and there will not be an accepted article, no matter how it is written. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 29

05:26:21, 29 May 2020 review of submission by Kary591995

Hello everyone there is a channel on YouTube named as "Kdt cool games" it deals with the tutorial of how to play a certain game and it also include gameplay. Kary591995 (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


05:50:06, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Cirinsusaki


Hello, My article has been dismissed for the following reason : This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

I used Japanese sources, that I translated myself from Wikipedia and the sources shown in the Japanese page. Unfortunately except Japanese sources, there are no English sources on the Internet. Are Japanese sources not seen as "reliable sources"?

Thank you in advance, Cirinsusaki

Cirinsusaki (talk) 05:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:00:05, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88


70.59.84.88 (talk) 06:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


06:13:47, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88

can you please check my draft 70.59.84.88 (talk) 06:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop asking. This is the third time in two days that you asked about this draft. Note to other reviewers: based on this question and the draft's history I suspect the IP to be a sockpuppet of the User:Adam Naa-complex. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:26:41, 29 May 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA


SONGEZO SA (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SONGEZO SA You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning that there is little to no chance that it can be improved enough to meet Wikipedia's standards. Please review the advice you were given by the reviewers. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:39:47, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Uros77


Hi,

I would need help to get my draft reviewed. Im not sure if everything is okay and as it should be. I did everything I was suggested. Can you help me? :)

Uros77 (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:50:18, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Benedict2005


Hello this is Benedict2005, and I am requesting help to deliver a message to the reviewers of wikipedia regarding my Draft Article "Baldivis Secondary college" I am a student who attends Baldivis Secondary College and have gathered as much information of the school to the draft article. Is it possible that because i attend there and have gathered as much information regarding the school to the article, that i also prove that my referencing are not just non-noteable and just passing mentions? I have gathered as much information regarding the college and im certain that there is no Bias, nor false information. Thank you. Benedict2005 (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:39:08, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 87.238.210.51


87.238.210.51 (talk) 12:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14:05:59, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Saitoti Torome


Saitoti Torome (talk) 14:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:56:56, 29 May 2020 review of draft by 1freedom


Hallo, I want to create the english wikipedia site for filmdirector, acrtress Mo Asumang. She already has a german and frensh site. Since I do not see the site published yet I am not sure if I worked correct. Would you be so kind and give me a short feedback, thanx. Bye for now, 1freedom

1freedom (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1freedom. Draft:Mo Asumang has not yet been submitted for review, so it hasn't been reviewed. But if it were submitted as it now stands it would not be accepted. The draft does not cite any sources at all, and it does not in any way establish that Asumang is Notable. Please understand that Wikipedia uses the term "notable" in a special technical sense, follow the link for details. The most common way to establish a person's notability is to find and cite multiple (usually at least 3) independent professionally published reliable sources that discuss the person in some depth and detail. This means no blogs, no fan or personal sites, and nothing written by the person or her employer or buisness associates, or based on a press release. it also means that directory entries, and brief mentions in discussions of other matters, film credits without critical comment, and the like, are of no value in establishing notability. Please follow the blue links for details. Please find and add sources that are independent of Asumang, reliable, and discuss her in detail before submitting this for review.
Please understand that having an article on the German and French language editions of Wikipedia in no way qualifies a person for an article on the English-language edition -- the projects are separate, with different polices and customs. Nor can the other Wikipedia articles be used as sources, although sources cited in them can often be used. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1freedom: (edit conflict) First of all, all different Wikipedia languages are different projects with their own set of rules, so the existence of an article in one project cannot be cited as an argument for the existence in another. For your draft:
  • It currently cites zero reliable sources and therefore fails the verifiability policy.
  • It makes excessive use of links. Please only link the important stuff where a link will be usefull for the reader
  • "brave" is WP:PUFFERY and doesn't belong in an encyclopedic article. We want to maintain a neutral point of view.
  • I have fixed the image transclusion for you. Here on enwiki, you use "File:" instead of "Datei:" and "thumb" instead of "mini". The latter ones are project-specific (here for the german wikipedia) while the former work global.
I am going to link you User:Ian.thomson/Howto, a guide on how to write articles that wont be declined, rejected or deleted. Since your draft is only one sentence so far, there isn't much to save. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:52:41, 29 May 2020 review of submission by Daimen Carter (Musician)


Daimen Carter (Musician) (talk) 17:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my article was not approved. I need further help https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Daimen_Carter_(Musician)

@Victorysriram: Assuming this is about Draft:Daimen Carter (Musician), blogs and forums are not reliable sources and stuff written by the subject or someone affilated with the subject also don't help to establish notability. Note that if you are affilated with the subject in anyway or are compensated or expect compensation for your edits there are some declarations to make. The latter would be a Terms of Use requirement. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:15:42, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6


2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6 (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mission Jaihind , ?? India's leading newspaper

20:05:32, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Mtennysdotter


Can someone please look over my https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Darren_Prince and give me some feedback? I feel stuck at what else to add.

Mtennysdotter (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


May 30

00:08:09, 30 May 2020 review of draft by Mtennysdotter


Not sure how to proceed or what to add. Thought I wrote the article objective but getting feedback that it's not. Can someone help me improve it? It's my first one I do. Mtennysdotter (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Mtennysdotter#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

00:12:39, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Chicago20092016


The page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fengqi_You) has been substantially revised to meet Wikipedia's rules. It is significantly shorten, and all possible violations to copyrights are removed. Could you please re-review and provide advice? Thank you!

Chicago20092016 (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:British Nuclear Medicine Society

01:13:42, 30 May 2020 review of draft by Earthianyogi


Hi, This article has been declined three times, and I am not sure why it does not fulfil the notability requirements. I have read this wiki link: Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:British_Nuclear_Medicine_Society . However, I am not sure why the following list is not enough? What more an organisation needs to demonstrate enough notability? My article is very similar to another article successfully published on Wikipedia with only 10 references - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Association_of_Nuclear_Medicine

References

JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS/CONFERENCE POSTERS:

1. Competencies and training of radiographers and technologists for PET/MR imaging - a study from the UK MR-PET network" European Journal of Hybrid Imaging. 4 (1): 1. doi:10.1186/s41824-019-0070-6. ISSN2510-3636. (2020).

2. Clinical trials in molecular radiotherapy—Tribulations and Triumphs Report of the NCRI CTRad meeting held at the Lift Islington, 8 June 2018 : https://www.birpublications.org/doi/abs/10.1259/bjr.20190117?journalCode=bjr

3. Evaluation of Radiopharmaceutical Adverse Reaction Reports to the British Nuclear Medicine Society from 2007 to 2016: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/58/12/2010.short

4. Quality assurance in myocardial perfusion tomography: a collaborative BNCS/BNMS audit programme. British Nuclear Cardiology Society/British nuclear Medicine Society. https://europepmc.org/article/med/10581589

5. A survey of nuclear cardiological practice in Great Britain https://heart.bmj.com/content/heartjnl/67/3/273.full.pdf

6. Global shortage of medical isotopes threatens nuclear medicine services BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1577 (Published 05 September 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1577

7. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence: A consensus conference organised by the British Cardiac Society, the British Nuclear Cardiology Society and the British Nuclear Medicine Society, endorsed by the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Radiologists https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-003-1344-5

8. The radiation dose to ward nurses from patients having nuclear medicine investigations: https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=18036859

9. Improving information for nuclear medicine department outpatients. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8047325

10. Hogg P, Holmes K. The interpretation of nuclear medicine data by non-medical health care professionals: Developments in the United Kingdom. Journal of Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging. 2000; 3: 77–85.

11. Audit of nuclear medicine scientific and technical standards: Nuclear Medicine Communications: August 2004 - Volume 25 - Issue 8 - p 771-775; https://journals.lww.com/nuclearmedicinecomm/Abstract/2004/08000/Audit_of_nuclear_medicine_scientific_and_technical.3.aspx

12. Evidence-based indications for the use of PET-CT in the United Kingdom 2016. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27207376

13. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence: https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC2562441&blobtype=pdf

14, Setting up a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy service: clinical and business aspects. https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC1876393&blobtype=pdf

15. Guidelines for the provision of radiopharmacy support to nuclear medicine. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/12744229

16. Guidelines for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate using plasma sampling. Nuclear Medicine Communications: August 2004 - Volume 25 - Issue 8 - p 759-769. https://journals.lww.com/nuclearmedicinecomm/Abstract/2004/08000/Guidelines_for_the_measurement_of_glomerular.2.aspx

17. The new BNMS guidelines for measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 01 Aug 2004, 25(8):755-757DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000136714.77658.4a PMID: 15266168

18. Isotope shortage is limiting nuclear medicine across Europe. BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1575 (Published 05 September 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1575; https://www.bmj.com/content/337/bmj.a1575.extract

19. Guidelines for the Provision of Physics Support to Nuclear Medicine; Nuclear Medicine Communications, 1999, 20, 781–787; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.6208&rep=rep1&type=pdf

20. Nuclear medicine in district general hospitals. Br Med J 1979; 2 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6201.1336 (Published 24 November 1979)


BNMS STAFF RELATED POST:

21. BNMS Vision - British Nuclear Medicine Society". www.bnms.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

22. McCready, Ralph; Gnanasegaran, Gopinath; Bomanji, Jamshed B. (9 March 2016). A History of Radionuclide Studies in the UK: 50th Anniversary of the British Nuclear Medicine Society. ISBN25. McCready, V. Ralph (2019-11-01). "The 70th anniversary of automated radionuclide imaging". European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 46 (12): 2414–2417. doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04413-5. ISSN1619-7089.


UK GOVT

23. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880548/ARSAC_NfG_Apr_2020.pdf

24. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/134202/bma-briefing-euratom-and-brexit.pdf


BOOKS:

25. Hamilton, David (David I.), 1951- (2011). Diagnostic nuclear medicine: a physics perspective. Springer. p.318. ISBN. OCLC1065219450.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) pg. 373

26. Sharp, Peter F. (2005). Practical Nuclear Medicine. Springer-Verlag London Ltd. p.65. ISBN. OCLC300259694.

27. Feld, Michael; Roo, Michel de (2003). History of Nuclear Medicine in Europe. p.81. ISBN.Festschrift – the Institute of Nuclear Medicine: 50 Years. 23 October 2011. ISBN. Pg 33.“The University of Leeds Review". 1987. Pg 278


REPORTS:

28. Royal College of Physician: Hybrid imaging guidance on legislative, reporting and training aspects Read the guidance". RCP London. 2016-11-25. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

29. The society of Radiographers: Covid-19 nuclear medicine recovery guidance | Society of Radiographers". www.sor.org. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

30. No-deal Brexit guidance for nuclear medicine teams | The Royal College of Radiologists". www.rcr.ac.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-05.


BLOG:

31. Nottingham University: “Far more talent than we counted on". Postgraduate Placements. 2019-10-21. Retrieved 2020-05-05.http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/postgraduateplacements/2019/10/21/far-more-talent- than-we-counted-on/

32. ECMC: https://www.ecmcnetwork.org.uk/news/announcement/cert-welcomes-support-british-nuclear-medicine-society


AWARDS:

33. The PET Centre". www.sthpetcentre.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

34. King's College London.mp4, retrieved 2020-05-29

35. IPEM > About IPEM > Prizes and Awards > IPEM Members winning external awards". www.ipem.ac.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

36. https://www.uhs.nhs.uk/ContactUs/Directoryofconsultants/Consultants-by-service/Radiology-scans-and-imaging-consultants/SaadDrZia.aspx

Thank you for your help. Earthianyogi (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Earthianyogi (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Earthianyogi: the concerns aren't about the count of references, its about their type. Wikipedia reqires reliable independent sources for establishing notability. I haven't checked them all, but stuff written by the subject or the article (or persons working at the subject of the article are not accepted. (and btw said page has 5 references, at least 2 of them appearing reliable and independent) Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor Schmidt:, thank you. I initially thought so. But when my article got rejected a couple times, I am forced to think that numbers do matter. Earthianyogi (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

01:45:06, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Watermelen


Watermelen (talk) 01:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my draft about Lydia Palmatier declined?

@Watermelen: As stated on Draft:Lydia Palmatier and on your user page, the draft fails to show that Palmatier is notable (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, your family, or your friends. Its articles are not a place to express your opinions. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

03:04:57, 30 May 2020 review of submission by 2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E


This is my first complete article to be written from scratch and entered for submission. I know I am not very good at it yet, but I am trying hard to get better by taking the advice given and making the changes suggested. I feel like I might have gotten it right this time, which is why I am requesting a re-review, but I know that I need others to feel the same way for it to be able to actually be published, so please let me thank you all who have helped me for both your great patience and continued kind consideration. Thank you. 2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E (talk) 03:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E (talk) 03:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @1292simon: as the reviewer who rejected. For the talkpage: I wasn't able to check the first two sources, but for the third one could argue that it is not WP:SIGCOV. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Victor Schmidt. Thanks for checking. I am happy for the article to be re-submitted now, so that someone else can review it. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 00:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:11:39, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Benedict2005


Im sorry if the wikipedia Article i created (The Goodwin Family) for review was not pleasing, or appropriate. However, is it ok to still work on my Article and still submit it for review if i just remove the "Place of Memorials"? The Goodwin family are in fact a significant family for the Titanic. Benedict2005 (talk) 06:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Benedict2005. Removing some small part is unlikely to transform the draft from a memorial into an encyclopedia article. The first source is a dead link. The second is a personal blog, so not a reliable source. Find-a-grave is a generally unreliable source. Encyclopedia Titanica is user-generated content, so not a reliable source either, see the WP:RSN archives. To continue working on the draft you would need to blow it up and start over from scratch, using reliable sources for history, like books from academic publishers.
Wikipedia has some articles about RMS Titanic's crew and passengers, and possibly another one could be acceptable. However, the overwhelming majority of people involved will never meet the encyclopedia's notability guidelines (inclusion criteria). Given the popularity of the topic and the number of Wikipedia editors, you can assume that articles about the most clearly notable people already exist. None of those articles is very good. Your time might be better spent improving an existing article instead of trying to create a new one. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:18:20, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Saileshkolanu

I am unable to create a biography page. Saileshkolanu (talk) 06:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saileshkolanu Writing an autobiographical article (not just a "page") is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia, please see the autobiography policy. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, that's what social media is for. Wikipedia summarizes only what independent reliable sources say about subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability(in this case, that of a notable creative professional like a director). If you truly meet that criteria, independent editors will eventually take note of you and your work and write about you.
Please also note that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:15:09, 30 May 2020 review of draft by Hana Moh HN


For the Draft:Nasser Al-Aswadi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nasser_Al-Aswadi Mr.1292simon put this question for me: This BLP does not include events that pass Wikipedia's notability thresholds. Does the WP:SPA author have a COI that should be disclosed? I am from Yemen, and I am interested in writing about artists in my country. This artist is a famous artist who has many artworks that you can search about and find on the internet. His exhibitions international ones. I hope you confirm it to be published. Hana Moh HN (talk) 17:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:31:17, 30 May 2020 review of submission by YiruoLiu

I was wondering why my submission was declined? I'm aware that there is already an OpenResty wikipedia page, but OpenResty and OpenResty Inc. are different things.

YiruoLiu (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi YiruoLiu. As stated on Draft:OpenResty Inc. and on your user page, the draft fails to show that the company is notable (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia), separate from the product OpenResty (which also fails to demonstrate notability, and will likely be deleted shortly). --Worldbruce (talk) 00:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:21:01, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Jackbigfan


What did i do wrong Jackbigfan (talk) 18:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackbigfan: Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, your family, or your friends. Its articles are not a place to promote or adulate anyone. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:51:50, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Amitmgosavi


Amitmgosavi (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


20:43:08, 30 May 2020 review of submission by RichardZack


Hello, an article submission I made was declined due to alleged notability reasons, however, multiple articles from independent sources were provided, including from TechCrunch and the Times Union, both well respected, independent publications. Can anyone help me understand why this wouldn't be considered notable?

RichardZack (talk) 20:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:52:49, 30 May 2020 review of submission by D.rainer

Editor said there are not enough sources. Which sources does it need for the article to be released? D.rainer (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@D.rainer: WP:NWEBSITE requires at least three reliable independent sources. Your draft currentely has two sources:
  • #1, alexa.com appears to be a directory listing, which are generally not accepted
  • #2 is the subject's own terms of use page. (which is not independent)
Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:13:21, 30 May 2020 review of submission by DenverBB

DenverBB (talk) 21:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Hi, could I please get advice on which areas of this article are causing the it to get rejected? All sources used are secondary sources not connected with the subject. All language is objective and fact-based from sources given. I would like to know what to change and how to avoid these issues on any other articles I contribute to in the future. Thank you![reply]

Your submission has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. The draft just tells about LaPedis. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability(in this case, the definition of a notable author). Your sources don't have in depth, significant coverage, they just tell things this author has done. Please read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 31

05:28:26, 31 May 2020 review of submission by ChrisParker92

Can someone please take a closer look at Draft:Mark Liu? It was recently rejected for not having significant coverage but there are quite a few sources that show significant coverage of Liu, not just passing mentions. Here are a few examples which include the world's largest financial newspaper and Taiwan's Central News Agency.

Here is more significant coverage:

From what I see from the time stamps, the article was turned down four minutes after it was put up. Could that really be enough time for an editor to carefully review the sources, particularly when many of them are foreign language sources? I would appreciate another look. Thanks! ChrisParker92 (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisParker92 (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:32:17, 31 May 2020 review of submission by 24.229.146.136


24.229.146.136 (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further as there is little to no chance it can be sufficiently improved to meet standards. It appears that the person you wrote about does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. You also do not offer independent reliable sources to support the content of the article; the article should only summarize what such sources state. Social media accounts are not independent reliable sources. Please read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 06:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:59:09, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Sachinlathiya007


Sachinlathiya007 (talk) 06:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sachinlathiya007: your only source so far is [1]. Wikipedia requires at least three reliable independent sources for notability as defined by Wikipedia. I don't have an opinion on wether postnewsgroup.com is reliable, but the last reviewers, @GoingBatty and Sulfurboy: seem to concour that it is not. Note that the two references appear to be the same. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:39:05, 31 May 2020 review of draft by Pretoriandlz


I submitted Draft:Ernest_Pierce for AfC. It was declined on the grounds that it has no inline citations for the Early Life and Education section. I have since removed it and resubmitted for review. My question here is that the information provided therein was pulled from the actor's IMDB profile: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2720736/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

Could someone elaborate if would be acceptable to cite IMDB Profile when the following non-contentious information is cited:

"Pierce was born in Chicago, Illinois, the son of Ernest Pierce Sr and Michelle Williamson.

Ernest began his career in off-Broadway and theatrical and musicals in New York and Chicago. He landed the role of Tyrone in FAME the Musical in College with the Illini Union Board Spring Musical, followed up with West Side Story. Prior to moving to Film/TV, he performed in Broadway productions such as the Son of a Preacher Man, Something’s Afoot, Death of a Salesman, The Piano Lesson and a host of others."

Thank you! Pretoriandlz (talk) 07:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pretoriandlz (talk) 07:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pretoriandlz, IMDB is not a reliable source as it uses user-generated content. As such, it should very rarely be used. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:41:57, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Andrej Shadura


I was told my submission has tone issues. Apparently the fact I wrote this submission prevents me from seeing them, but I paid attention to using neutral tone as much as possible. How can I improve on that?

I would also like to point out my original thought was to expand the article on Vuze to include the information on BiglyBT since in the situation when the original project is more or less dead, and continues under a new brand, it seemed like a better fit to me, but my initial addition of a paragraph on that has been reverted as an attempt to spam and I was told that not until an article on that is written and accepted, it can be re-added. I’m honestly a bit afraid of touching that article again (I did add a paragraph on the original project being dead and to be fair I expected it to be reverted just because I added it.)

I have no conflict of interest whatsoever in this case, this is not part of any promotion campaign, and to be honest it hurts quite a bit to be seen as a spammer after editing Wikipedia for many years and having proven track record of never spreading spam or being involved in any similar activity.

Andrej Shadura (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:49:30, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Anujjaju

Khushi Maheshwari is a famous social media personality from India having 5M+ followers. When People search for her name, they should have proper information about her. Like other social media personalities eg. Garima Chaurasiya, Priya Prakash Warrior this page has full potential to be added to Wikipedia. Why it is being rejected? Anujjaju (talk) 07:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anujjaju It appears that this person does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about someone, and has no interest in enhancing search results for a subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that summarizes what independent reliable sources state about a subject, showing how they meet the Wikipedia definition of notability. Your draft had no sources at all. Please read Your First Article for more information. It does not matter if a person has five followers, or five million, or fifty million, they must be written about in independent sources to merit a Wikipedia article. Subscriber/follower numbers are easily gamed(a person can create more than one account to "like" someone) so that is not an indicator of notability. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:52:46, 31 May 2020 review of submission by 71.104.11.211


71.104.11.211 (talk) 07:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:32:55, 31 May 2020 review of draft by Indy beetle


I'm trying to review the above draft (which would be my first). I've followed all the steps laid out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script, and yet I am unable to launch the script. I'm not seeing a "More" collapsible tab under which to find the script and run it. -Indy beetle (talk) 08:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indy beetle (talk) 08:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Indy beetle: Which skin are you using? Only vector (the default skin since 2013) has a "More" dropdown, for other skins the links to activate the AFC helper script are elsewhere. If that doesn't help, please check your browser console. All modern browsers (but not nessesarely the mobile versions thereof) have a feature called Console or similar. Look for things that are in red. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:41:20, 31 May 2020 review of draft by BoldLuis


BoldLuis (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:08:22, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Pn1919

We are trying to get Tom Bertram's encylopedic article on Wikipedia, but seem to keep running into issues. Please can you recommend resolutions to have an article approved.

Pn1919 (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use. If you are being paid to edit this you need to declare this. Interviews, Wikipedia, Blogs, YouTube and Twitter are not suitable sources, so the draft does not shown that he is notable. Theroadislong (talk) 12:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:18:36, 31 May 2020 review of submission by EmanuelB2019

Hello, moderators and contributors to Wikipedia! I respectfully ask for the help of this world elite community to publish the page of the American writer of Romanian origin "Carmen Harra" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Carmen_Harra, whose books (6 books) are found in the Library of the American Congress. I published on the page the link that proves the existence of the books in the Library of Congress, at the request of the moderators to justify the creation of this page. In addition, I provided links to the page showing the writer's appearances in the Central American press, in newspapers such as the New York Post, and on television stations such as NBC New York and CBS Los Angeles. It is equally easy to verify that the writer Carmen Harra was a well-known singer in Europe in the 70s and 80s and that she currently has her own radio show at the American station OMTimes Radio. I have browsed many pages published by Wikipedia in recent years, about all kinds of people who have performed in their fields of activity and who deserve to be included in an index of the most important online encyclopedia. And I noticed that this writer, who is on the same level as other public figures on Wikipedia, does not have the page. Six months ago, I started working on this page, an absolutely new experience for me. I received valuable guidance from MurielMary and Sulfurboy on what a Wikipedia page should look like and I would like to thank them on this occasion for their help. I sent the page for moderation, and the other day, 1292simon rejected it because of the reason "promotional article". I requested arguments for this opinion, especially since other moderators appreciated that the page is written in a neutral style, specific to Wikipedia. Please help me to correct the errors on this page so that it can be published. There are many similar pages already published about the Romanian beautician Anastasia Soare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anastasia_Soare, about the Romanian singer Andreea Balan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreea_Bălan, about the TV presenter Andreea Esca https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreea_Esca and about the writer Colette Baron-Reid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colette_Baron-Reid. Wikipedia also indexes many people who have "stood out" publicly by committing abominable deeds or as mere politicians. All this information is normal to appear in an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia, like Wikipedia, groups information from absolutely all fields of activity. And since no one is a specialist in all areas and no one is all-knowing, it is normal to find out with Wikipedia about people we have never heard of, even though these people have been around for years and have performed in their fields. Even though we are all human and are often subjective, it is normal to recognize the professional merits of others. I call on the fairplay of the Wikipedia community to apply the same rules to all published pages. The "Carmen Harra" page reached its present form after six months of editing together with the moderators who gave their precious time to help the correct and verified presentation of the information. Please offer your contribution objectively and support me in this endeavor which is done from my exclusive position as a reader of books written by Carmen Harra. Thank you and I look forward to your feedback! EmanuelB2019 (talk) 12:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:53:01, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Triantares

Dear reviewers, I'm sorry but I'm at a loss now. You mention there are still WP:PROMO issues there which I don't see at all...nor any WP:COI as I am not in anyway affiliated with said distribution other than being an avid user and having volunteered to edit and re-submit the English WP entry which had been deleted for some reason a while back. If anything the only thing that can be done (in the sense of less WP:PROMO) now IMO is delete the whole entry, which would be kind of silly considering that the Elive Linux distribution has been around for at least 15 years and certainly should be mentioned and linked as such together with other distributions. Looking and comparing with other WP entries concerning (especially commercial) Linux distributions: They might as well all be removed with even more promotional issues and COIs than the current Elive submission IMO. Notably EliveLinux is the only distribution that does not have an internal link here and hereList_of_Linux_distributions#Third-party_distributions and there's definitely more.

I do agree that the links in the article might be a little overdone, in the sense that they're too many and distracting. To some degree that was due to a first review pointing out too few reliable 3rd party references.

It would be greatly helpful if the issues could be clearly pointed out as, like I stated I do not see them and certainly do not want to keep making the same mistakes in other entries or articles. Thanks in advance, any guidance will be greatly appreciated.


Triantares (talk) 12:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:09:51, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Marcywinograd


Marcywinograd (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and wondering about redirects. I noticed that articles that have a lot of page views (many thousands) are redirects from topics that do not have a Wikipedia page. If I want to redirect from an unpublished Wikipedia topic (decarceration) similar to my Wikipedia entry (Decarceration in the United States), do I need to 1) Create a new page for Decarceration 2) Go to page settings and redirect that page to my page: Decarceration in the United States 3)Submit that redirection/page for approval, as though I am submitting a real article that an administrator will have to approve? Thanks for any guidance you can offer. Warm regards, MarcyMarcywinograd (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcywinograd: as far as I can see you are WP:AUTOCONFIRMED, so you can yust go on and create the redirect page. You don't need an approval. You can find the policy regarding redirects at Wikipedia:Redirect. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Victor, for your prompt reply. I did read the Redirect page and tried to figure it out, but am confused as to how to redirect from an unpublished topic, like "prison inmate reduction" to "decarceration in the United States" which is published. As an autoconfirmed user, what do I do? Thank you for your patience. Best wishes, MarcyMarcywinograd (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:35:11, 31 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Yellowmajestymusic


Dear Wikipedia,

I need help with publishing an article 'Yellow Majesty'. The article describes my music project and I don't know how to fullfil all the requirements needed in order to get the article published. Any further (explicit) assistance would thus be highly appreciated!

Thank you in beforehand.

Amir Yellowmajestymusic (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has zero sources, writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged and you would need to pass the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN first. Theroadislong (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:40:56, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Mye


I am preparing an article about a Ukrainian processing company existing since 1995. Previously, only the Ukrainian version of the page existed. But now we are working with foreign clients, and it would be more correct to have information in different languages

Tanks usb31 18:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Mye#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:21:59, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Jschwam

The article was declined because of lack of sport notability criteria, but did not specify which line was problematic, and what kind of source would be more accurate and be able to pass the criteria. Please advise. Thank you! Jschwam (talk) 23:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jschwam: If Wikipedians are talking about notability, its usally not a specific line of the draft or article, but rather the sources used. in this case, @Robert McClenon: stated on Draft:Michael Kraus (lacrosse) that WP:NSPORTS isn't met (click the blue link to find out the criteria). I am not an expert at sportlers notability, and, as such, don't have an opinion on the notability, but it would help if you indicated which of the notability guidelines you used. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Jschwam User:Victor Schmidt - The issue isn't what line is problematic or an issue with any particular source. For sports notability, there is a long list of notability criteria, one for which sport, but there isn't a criterion for field lacrosse. So to accept a field lacrosse player, they must either satisfy general notability, or one of the criteria in the sports notability list must apply. I didn't see a criterion that applies. So the issue isn't what was wrong with the submission, but what wasn't right with the submission. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My advice about field lacrosse would be that lacrosse fans can form a task force to add a special notability criterion for lacrosse players. I don't have any other advice. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In summary, it isn't what was wrong; it was what wasn't right. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 1

06:15:46, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Gidicloud


Gidicloud (talk) 06:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking based on my first article which I wrote now it was declined, I want to asked what exactly is the problem, was the article not good enough and what can I do to make it approved

@Gidicloud: Your draft currently cites two sources:
As such, the draft doesn't meet WP:NWEBSITE and cannot be approved in its current version. The criteria for websites are, in short, that multiple, reliable independent sources are cited in the article/draft. Note that it is important that such sources are given in the draft, asserting their existence without having them in there wont make a draft approved. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:22:07, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Sachi1307


Hello, Could you let me know if the list of product looks like a advertisement, but there are other Articles listing of product which are not deleted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XP-PEN

Sachi1307 (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sachi1307 Please read other stuff exists. It is usually a poor argument to cite other similar articles as a reason for yours to exist. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. We can only address what we know about. In addition, as time passes, standards change and what was once acceptable may not be any longer. Your draft looks like an advertisement because it just tells about the company and its products. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage(not brief mentions, routine announcemments, staff interviews, etc.) say about a subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability(in this case, the definition of a notable company).
If you know of other inappropriate articles, please point them out so they can be addressed. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for letting me know, I will revise it and resubmit again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachi1307 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:07:37, 1 June 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by DominicanWikiEdit1996


I'm requesting assisstance because I have edit several draft of a page and it keeps getting declined. It's a draft about a bachata group's album call "We Got Next" from Xtreme. This album was released in 2003 and there's barely information about it because the album didn't have notoriety at the time. The group never really mentioned a lot about the album because they were later on signed to a record label and then their 2005 album became know as their debut album. I've put in references and extra links to prove that the article is accurate, but it still gets rejected.

This is the link to the draft: Xtreme - We Got Next (Album)

DominicanWikiEdit1996 (talk) 08:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DominicanWikiEdit1996 I answered you at the Teahouse, please only use one method of seeking assistance, to avoid duplication of effort. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:28:09, 1 June 2020 review of submission by VidhyadhariK


Dear Team,

I just got to know the Draft:Chaithra Rai, got a mail saying that my article submission was declined, I what to the reason for rejection and also what to know what I am missing and in what criteria I have to improve my self and the data to be added resubmission.

VidhyadhariK (talk) 12:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:46:28, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Luca929


Luca929 (talk) 12:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've never written a wikipedia page before so I am very clueless at what I am doing. I was tasked with doing for someone I know, thinking it would be simple but I was wrong.

@Luca929:

14:02:38, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Newlywo

hello, I do not understand how Mr Isaac isnt notable.. we are talking about an Israeli journalist, editor and presenter on the biggest most viwed channel in Israel and mostly, a known personallty in Israel. There 5 Links and 19 References. I'm asking for a fair and new review to be made. Thank you.

Newlywo (talk) 14:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


13:38:00, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Amkgp


Amkgp (talk) 13:438, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Team, I've never written a Wikipedia page before. In fact, I got a warning before, for editing in Article Space without trying a sandbox edit. so I am very clueless about what I am doing. Now I got a review from Amkgp(Wikipedia member) that my article creation was disappointing. I am sorry for this action. Actually My idea was creating a company page article. But I don't know about the full editing about the article creation. Can you give me the solution for creating this page? Thank you in Advance.

(Note) This subject appears to be inside the the cryptocurrency area, which is currently under general sanctions. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Riyasteve: You may go through Help:Your first article, and keep in mind what Victor Schmidt has pointed out. Its very important. You can always ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thank you

15:07:21, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Luca929


This is my first time creating a Wikipedia page. Can anyone give advice or assist on how to get this published? Luca929 (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It’s actually your second time creating a Wikipedia page, as this Draft:Treo (Drink) was also rejected. The topics are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


15:32:53, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Amanniste


I would request a second look by an editor who might be more familiar with the subject of art as far as determination of notability is concerned

Amanniste (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:53:59, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Himanshuaroraa

Hi, I was trying to create an article for someone I know, I wrote content and added citations. but I did some mistakes, Now I am trying to figure out where I can make some improvements to get it live on Wikipedia. I got permission from Itsanupkumar. I do not what citations could be more reliable to Wikipedia. I request you to help me with this. Information I am providing is hundred per cent genuine. What tone can be acceptable?

This article has one more copy on Wikipedia as a draft. Can you also remove that and consider this?

Himanshuaroraa (talk) 15:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:31:31, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Nasimarad


Nasimarad (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Please somebody help me! I've tried many ways to put this article on Wikipedia which is about a really professional man but every time someone rejects it and I don't know why. If you know how I can fix this and if you can help me please do me a favor and contact me. I'm new in Wikipedia and I don't know why it is so hard to put a single article about someone's personal & professional life.

19:11:56, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Mye


Volunteering

question icon

Hello Worldbruce

No i don't get any pay for trying to create this article. I have been working in this company for a long time (more than 19 years) and recently discovered that we don't have normal information on the Ukrainian wikipadia, and in general there is no page in the English version. I have no relation to the PR team or something like that, but I always like to see quality information. I act here as a volunteer, and as a person who knows the history of the company

My contribution to the wiki is so small that I don’t think anyone would be interested in my personal story on Mye profile. Although after you pointed out its absence, the thought of its creation was born.

usb31 19:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


19:41:49, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Caryplace7


I wrote a biography on Mike Greenhaus, Editor-in-Chief of Relix Magazine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mike_Greenhaus) I have been working on the biography for several weeks and it has been looked at by several editors. Last week an editor said I had enough articles (3) to show notability and that I should resubmit. However, another editor just rejected the claim of notability How do I proceed?

Caryplace7 (talk) 19:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:56:58, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Yoshiiiiiii


I am asking for a re-review because I added more context to who SOUL was and provided better citations to provide further context. Yoshiiiiiii (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


20:31:49, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Dylan Hendricks

I started this article on my own and have a draft page started, but I want to know how to add specific collaborators to my draft so we can work on it together. Dylan Hendricks (talk) 20:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=960229903"