Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PragmaDev Process
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PragmaDev Process (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable editor program; all sources are primary, independent uptake (let alone coverage) appears not to exist. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I couldn't find any indication of notability or coverage during my search. - Flori4nKT A L K 00:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Pragmatically content could have been usefully added to PragmaDev Studio by creator Manu31415 who perhaps should be aware better references are needed for an article to stay in mainspace. Not really needing of a redirect/merge unless there's demonstratable need for the cats as should be adequately searchable. If something substantial found with an adequate WP:THREE not adverse to keeping.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The article is entirely based on two independent scientific papers that have been published following peer reviews: Automatic Verification of BPMN Models at ERTS2 Conference and Verification of BPMN models at CSD&M Conference. These two publications are reliable and independent sources that establish notability of the work. Even though the work was meant to rely to PragmaDev Studio at start, it turned out to be completely independent as explained in the papers. That is why this would not fit in the PragmaDev Studio page. --Manu31415 (talk) 09:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Two papers by the same team which is affiliated with PragmaDev (yes, it's all in the article header [1]). Nope. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I had the opportunity to use PragmaDev Process in the past for industrial use cases. This tool is independent of PragmaDev Studio, do not provide the same services nor is usefull for the same purposes. PragmaDev Process provides features I have never encountered in another tool until now like evaluating a BPMN process runnability (compliance to BPMN execution standards) or identifying unreachable path in a set of BPMN processes. To my knowledge, PragmaDev Process had been presented on its own in 2 different conferences : 10th CSD&M Paris[1] and 10th ERTS Toulouse[2]
Additionally this tool interest is asserted by a well known editor as PragmaDev and MEGA International Srl. have signed an Alliance partnership agreement in 2020 and PragmaDec PRocess is to be integrated in the V3 version of HOPEX. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narkoa (talk • contribs) 18:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)