Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Blake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 04:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth Blake

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:GNG and the tone is unclear. The content has primarily been supported by bare URLs. Abishe (talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It is hard to assess WP:Prof#C1 because the writer of this poorly written BLP has not provided a GS profile. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Ten publications with over 100 citations each on Google Scholar is enough for WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Eppstein; I think WP:PROF#C1 is adequately met here (and so WP:GNG is beside the point). XOR'easter (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As above. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per above Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article has good references. — Toughpigs (talk) 20:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep I think WP:PROF#C1 She is cited in Sulfur Biogeochemistry: Past and Present, Issue 379 and cited in many more. Lightburst (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As others have said. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - professor at an Ivy League university, who won a major award. Bearian (talk) 21:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.